User talk:Pleriche
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Pleriche, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Introduction
- 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help
Tips
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Kralizec! (talk) 13:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article St Albans Bach Choir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No WP:RS and I could not find any additional via search
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of St Albans Bach Choir for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St Albans Bach Choir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Albans Bach Choir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 00:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Bach Choir (disambiguation)
[edit]Hi Pleriche, the purpose of disambiguation pages is to guide readers to existing information, not to provide that information, so DAB pages do not have references. I have removed the reference that you added and done some other clean-up per according to MOS:DAB. Leschnei (talk) 01:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:SABC at Rudolfinum.jpg
[edit]![Image Copyright problem](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:SABC at Rudolfinum.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you Ronhjones (Talk) for pointing that out. Not being a copyright expert I assumed/(hoped) that since the original image was a poster implicitly intended for the widest possible dissemination then my derivative work could at least be considered "fair use". However, I'm actively seeking clarification from the concert promoters and will amend the image and/or metadata in accordance with their response.Pleriche (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's currently set up as a free image. You will have to change it for a fair-use (non-free) image. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information, it might fail on No.8 though. Non-free images cannot be used just to "decorate" an article. See also examples at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Non-free_poster to see how a non free poster is set up. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Email sent to both the concert promoters named on the poster with no response over a week later. I'll send a chaser and if still no reply after a reasonable period I'll change to Fair Use.Pleriche (talk) 09:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pleriche, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
wumbolo ^^^ 20:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)