User talk:Pranabesh007

Bengali, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pranabesh007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Priyadarshini Chatterjee, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOINDICSCRIPT

Re: this, as I have previously explained, we do not use Indic script in an article's lead. See WP:INDICSCRIPT. Most of your edits at that article seem to revolve around Indic script. If you have thoughts about how her native name should be presented in that article, you need to discuss them on that article's talk page. If you are not willing to discuss and keep making edits that are unexplained and against community consensus, it will be considered disruptive. Discussion is your strongest tool. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issues regarding your recent edits

Hi, I have noticed that your recent edits in various articles are without reference and with false informations(like the entire Barak Valley was not part of Bangal, only Korimganj District was part of it). I don't know why you remove assamese scripts from their appropriate places. If you have any issues regarding any articles, just leave a note on the discussion page.-Ajay Das (অজয় দাস) (Talk(বাৰ্তা)) 14:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Darjeeling district and Darjeeling, you may be blocked from editing. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 12:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sikkim. Final warning for disruptive edits on multiple articles, adding personal POV comments, removing content with no explanation etc etc. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 12:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:13, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranabesh007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Language Bengali is the second language of tezpur.So I have included the language in the page,I hope u understand the situation u can search of indigenous Bengali people of TezpurPranabesh007 (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Contributions

I have made necessary contributions to the page of Tezpur,but to my utter dilemma I have been blocked whereas some other user removed the word Bengali from the Tezpur page.So,I think the block is unnecessary as I have neither removed or disrupted any word,but included indigenous peoples language Bengali to the Page Tezpur,whereas some fellow people removed it and generated fake block request to block me.Dear administrator u can see my past contributions.Hope u check it out too. Pranabesh007 (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True contributor

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranabesh007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear,administrator I have included the reason to my talk page kindly read the same and unblock me if u wish too.Contributing by including Indigeneous Bengali language to the page Tezpur should be welcomed but some people generated block request to block my account from contributing valuable information in the future.I hope u can check out my past contributions.Pranabesh007 (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for persistent addition of unsourced content and for refusal to discuss your changes. You need to show all of your sources were cited (see WP:CITE, WP:RS) and that you did indeed discuss your changes on the articles' talk pages. Or you need to convinced us you have read these policies and guidelines, understand why your behaviour was inappropriate, and convince us we can be sure it'll never happen again. So far, you haven't addressed these concerns at all. Yamla (talk) 14:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note Pranabesh007, you have no edits at Tezpur in your edit history, yet you've mentioned this article on three different occasions on your talk page above. So which one of the edits at Tezpur were yours? Because it's a little confusing that you're talking about edits at Tezpur. As I look through your recent edits [2][3][4][5][6][7] I see unsourced additions, along with grammar, spelling and typographical errors, which are also problematic, because we expect editors to be able to contribute in proper English. Note also that in October 2016 I told you that per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT we do not use Indic script in article leads. And per more recent consensus at the Noticeboard for Indian Topics, Indic scripts are not to be added to the infobox. So It's unclear why you are talking about adding indigenous Bengali language to the page Tezpur or why you think this would be welcomed. Given the confusion here, I too would have declined your unblock request. It may be more efficient if you respond to the questions above in the space below, rather than opening a new unblock request, at least for the time being. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranabesh007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request you to tell me why have u blocked me clearly so that I will be sure of why u have brought such drastic punishment for the deed.Kindly request u to tell me the reasons or the time period for how many weeks I have been blocked.Further request you to provide me last warning too contribute proper English in Wikipedia and unblock me.Pranabesh007 (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pranabesh007 (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you answer the questions I left above, so we can get a better idea of whether or not you are able to edit here constructively? Repeatedly posting unblock request without participating in the discussions is not going to go well for you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]