User talk:Prasadk60

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Prasadk60, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vijayawada has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Vin09 (talk) 13:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Vijayawada, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 13:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Vijayawada. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Vijayawada shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Vijayawada. Vin09 (talk) 07:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chennai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 22:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Vijayawada. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Vin09. Your recent edit to the page List of cities in India by population appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 04:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Vin09. Your recent edit to the page List of cities in India by population appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 05:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of cities in India by population. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 14:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revert on Information_technology_in_India[edit]

How would you justify your revert here ? ttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Information_technology_in_India&oldid=prev&diff=752278162 01tonythomas (talk) 21:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hyderabad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. https://indiapopulation2018.in/ is not a reliable website. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm DavidLee200. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Globalization and World Cities Research Network have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DavidLee200 (talk) 21:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]