User talk:Priyankanift

helpme

how to start an article ? how to edit an article ?

Wikipedia:Introduction should be a good place for you to start--Jac16888 ^Talk 21:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Satish Kumar Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Satish Kumar Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Satish Kumar Singh, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sushil Kumar (Winner KBC 5)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sushil Kumar (Winner KBC 5) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Angry Python (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kavita Saluja

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kavita Saluja requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO A&E⇑ 22:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vermapriya1986. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 20:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Indian Fashion Industry, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Govind Kumar Singh. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 11:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you are reverting two different people at Govind Kumar Singh and, indeed, if you go back further through the article history then you will see that you have effectively reverted against a consensus that involves many others. The article had numerous problems involving sockpuppets of User:Vermapriya1986, who was eventually indefinitely blocked. Your contributions are reinstating material regarding which Vermapriya1986 and the sockpuppets were edit warring. For example, Vermapriya1986 kept introducing images that were contrary to our policies (they were proven copyright violations) and tried to "puff up" Singh's reputation. In addition, and since Vermapriya1986's time, the Wikipedia India Project conducted a Request for Comment that resulted in a consensus not to include indic scripts in the lead section of articles, and you are over-riding that consensus - see User:Sitush/Common#Scripts for more information.

I suggest that you self-revert now otherwise you too may find yourself blocked from contributing. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 11:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image in the Govind Kumar Singh article

I have opened discussion about the image used in this article at Talk:Govind Kumar Singh#Image. As one of the parties involved in the addition or removal of the image, I am notifying you of the thread directly and inviting you to participate. —C.Fred (talk) 13:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

We are happy to hear that; btw, take a little care, and have a look at our introduction, as linked far above.

Lectonar (talk) 13:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Priyankanift, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 04:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]