Jump to content

User talk:Proeminente

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Proeminente, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 23:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

[edit]

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

AfroCine: 2021 Months of African Cinema Contest Winners

[edit]

Greetings!

After successfully completing the 2021 Months of African Cinema Global Contest on 30 November 2021, we are happy to announce the winners in the contest!

Over 4,000 articles were created across 17 language Wikipedias, surpassing all expectations and placing the contest firmly as one of the most successful article-writing contests on Wikipedia. A big thank you to you and every single person who created articles during the period of the contest for making this happen!

All our winners have now been announced and you can check the complete list here. We'd still be contacting everyone who has won something separately to send over their prizes. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! –Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Austin Brooks

[edit]
Notice

The article Philip Austin Brooks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any actual notability: sources are all press releases, and Google News only returns similar press releases, no actual news reports about him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Do that Proeminente (talk) 10:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AngoCinema

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AngoCinema requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why are you chasing me? Proeminente (talk) 11:00, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I see a new editor creating a suspicious article (one like your "basket player" one above which looks like WP:PAID editing) or an otherwise problematic article, it is normal to check if this is a one-off issue or whether other creations and edits by the same editor also are not acceptable for Wikipedia. What would be the benefit to Wikipedia of ignoring potential problems with an editor after having found a seriously lacking article? Why wouldn't I or others check your articles? Fram (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to retrieve the deleted material (Only AngoCinema) for future reference or improvement. Proeminente (talk) 12:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please read through WP:PAID and confirm that you have complied with the requirements there, please? Sam Kuru (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just read the article. And I confirm that I will meet the requirements. Proeminente (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have edited the article again and failed to comply with WP:PAID. Let me be a little more clear: do not make any more edits until you have made the proper disclosures. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 01:46, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OMG. I forgot. I'm gotta do that right now Proeminente (talk) 01:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. For that article, please stick to reliable sources for some of the wild marketing claims. Unfortunately, there's been a lot of clumsy SEO and paid placement used, so I think it's best to stick to high quality sources. On another topic, do you have any relation to the Sizzlingstar89 (talk · contribs) account? They were trying to add similar PR material for that entity today. Sam Kuru (talk) 03:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very Proeminente (talk) 03:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philip Austin Brooks for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philip Austin Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Austin Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UPE

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Proeminente. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Proeminente. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Proeminente|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 178.115.63.145 (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AngoCinema

[edit]

Hello, Proeminente. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AngoCinema".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 08:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AaPanel moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to AaPanel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Proeminente (talk) 15:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. S0091 (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean?, I can't edit or create page on wiki? Proeminente (talk) 15:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It means you need to comply with WP:PAID, as has been instructed a couple times above. You stated you would but then didn't. S0091 (talk) 18:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AaPanel (September 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Neither aapanel.com, nor github are reliable sources. Please find secondary sources to include, and remove the bias.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 18:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Proeminente! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk / cont) 18:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AaPanel (September 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Removal of a source does nothing to help establish notability. Previous decline still stands.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:AaPanel has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AaPanel. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AaPanel (September 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Youtube is not reliable, aapanel.com is not reliable, neither establish the subject's notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 00:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Proeminente&oldid=1244928965"