User talk:QuotationMan

Hello, QuotationMan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Monopoly of Initiative

A tag has been placed on Monopoly of Initiative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Monopoly of Initiative, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 15:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Monopoly of Initiative

I have nominated Monopoly of Initiative, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monopoly of Initiative. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 16:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monopoly of Initiative

I wish to draw your attention to this. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI reported re your edits

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:QuotationMan_and_Declan_Ganley_etc Catapla (talk) 21:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI continued

I wish to draw your attention to this. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 01:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

You have edited a great deal of sources from pages. This is POV pushing. It is not good practice to remove verifiable third party sources because you disagree with their contents. Please explain your all your edits on the talk pages involved. Catapla (talk) 17:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Reputable third party sources have been removed from Declan Ganley's page as he disagrees with them. Any of Ganley's associations which he deems negative (despite reference) are swiftly deleted, usually without explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthinirishpolitics (talk • contribs) 11:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Libertas.eu

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Libertas.eu. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. EdJohnston (talk) 05:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Edit warring. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

You have been edit warring at Libertas.eu and Declan Ganley. Your removal of well-sourced material from articles suggests that you are trying to make the article subjects look better, thus causing Wikipedia articles to reflect your personal point of view. This issue was first reported at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 13:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are being discussed

Hi, you have been reported to the conflict of interest notice board here Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#QuotationMan_is_a_Single_Purpose_Account due to your recent editing. You are welcome to comment on the discussion. Thank you Smartse (talk) 13:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Disruptive editing. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Continued removal of well-sourced criticism from Declan Ganley. Apparent WP:COI editing. Your block may be lifted early if you will agree to stay off this article and limit yourself to editing the Talk page. This issue has been discussed at WP:COIN#QuotationMan is a Single Purpose Account. EdJohnston (talk) 14:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|1=I understand the reason for my block, and will completely stop writing anything on Libertas, Declan Ganley and related articles for the next week, as requested by EdJohnston. I would like to request to be unblocked so I can participate in the discussion forums alone.--QuotationMan (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

OK, unblocked per your assurance. I understand you are promising not to edit Declan Ganley, Libertas.eu, Democratic deficit, Libertas Institute, Libertas Bulgaria, and all articles related to Libertas, Declan Ganley, or the election in which Ganley is participating. If this is not correct let me know right away.

Request handled by: EdJohnston (talk) 15:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

QM has replied at User talk:EdJohnston

In case other admins want to check on the status of the deal, QuotationMan replied on my user talk, agreeing to the above conditions, but naming some other editors who he perceives belong to a group opposed to Ganley. EdJohnston (talk) 16:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to draw your attention to this

I wish to draw your attention to this. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 22:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of ban

Hello QuotationMan. Please explain why you should not be blocked for violating your topic ban from the Declan Ganley article. EdJohnston (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the above wording, in the unblock, puts no time limit on your topic ban. If you're not accepting that deal then the block will be restored. EdJohnston (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of ban

Sorry! I was under the impression I was only banned from those sites for 1 week, as the block I requested lifted was only a block for 1 week. I will not write anything on the sites until we have a new agreement.

I would like to request permission to write on the pages again. I will only make small positive contributions and not remove any sensitive material - such as my latest edits which you undid. With your permission I would like to be allowed to make contributions such as these.

--QuotationMan (talk) 10:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no new information that makes me think the topic ban should be changed or lifted. EdJohnston (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judicial activism in the European Union for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judicial activism in the European Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judicial activism in the European Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]