User talk:Raj goud

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Raj goud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 10:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Goud has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Goud people[edit]

I have nominated Category:Goud people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -SpacemanSpiff 03:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aldas Janaiah Goud[edit]

The article Aldas Janaiah Goud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions 00:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Goud[edit]

Category:Goud, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 09:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

If you should revisit then will you please read WP:NPOV before contributing anything. I have had to clean up vast amounts of your extreme points of view across several allegedly Goud-related articles today. It is not acceptable. - Sitush (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Your addition to G. Bikshapathy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

The above is only one of several articles where you have made blatant copyright infringements. Please do not do this. Sitush (talk) 18:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Gouds[edit]

The article List of Gouds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the article is blank.if there are any notable gouds with reference about their caste.one can add in the main article.if the list becomes too long we can recreate this article.delete for now.otherwise people will keeping on adding unreferenced names

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pernoctator (talk) 04:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]