User talk:Ramonemanskillet

I write for Jules Verne, and bands such as Skillet, The Ramones and CCR (Creedence Clearwater Revival.)

Ways to improve Backwards to Britain

Hi, I'm Kieranian2001. Ramonemanskillet, thanks for creating Backwards to Britain!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Reviewed as part of page curation. Seems relevant though the article needs expansion and development.Kieranian2001 (talk) 13:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamaholedowner

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Hamaholedowner, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PhantomTech (talk) 03:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hamaholedowner

The article Hamaholedowner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable word; neologism.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hamaholedowner

The article Hamaholedowner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:MADEUP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. hmssolent\^{Let's convene} _{My patrols} 01:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamaholedowner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamaholedowner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamaholedowner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Funny ^Pika! 07:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamaholedowner International

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hamaholedowner International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. And Adoil Descended (talk) 17:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We As Human

Please do me a favour. Could you click on We As Human and then let me know what you see. The reason I ask this favour is that you've been adding material to various articles and linking to that place. The first problem is that the material is being added without references. In most cases, linking to the album's liner notes or even the credits on Allmusic.com would be enough, and editors would just tag the material with a citation needed template, but when the linked subject isn't notable, it makes it that much more difficult to support at any level. That's why I've been removing the additions. So if you tell me what you see, it would help me. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You won't see anything now - I've just deleted that article (again).Deb (talk) 20:00, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may be pleased to know that an experienced editor has been busy creating an article for We as Human. Feel free to link to that article and the accompanying album at We as Human (album). Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

July 2013

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Walter Görlitz that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Making and then deleting a personal attack is still a personal attack. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Walter_G%C3%B6rlitz&diff=562742601&oldid=562494346 As for the attitude, I suggest you pick another favourite band because the demonstrated behaviour was far from Christian. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:55, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]