User talk:Ratz wiki
June 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Outlander07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shobana have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Outlander07@talk 15:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shobana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Use the talk page for your concerns. Outlander07@talk 16:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shobana, you may be blocked from editing. Outlander07@talk 16:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sobhana, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove conent. Discuss in talk page first and gain WP:CONSENSUS. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shobana. Raise your concern in the talk page and wait for some time (probably days) so that we can reach a concensus. You edit wars will get you blocked. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)- Additionally, you appear to have a clear conflict of interest, which is a serious ethical concern, and if the block is lifted by another administrator, you are strongly discouraged from editing any content related to Shobana, because people with conflicts of interest have a very hard time writing objectively about the subject they have a conflict of interest with. Further note that this page is not a social media profile, it is an encyclopedic article that belongs to Wikipedia, and the community gets to decide what sort of content is or isn't suitable for inclusion, not her or you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Ratz wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, It's really disheartening to see the genuine edit attempts are being marked as Vandalism and blocked from WikiPedia. Request you to please closely watch my previous attempts and see the nature of edits I have done so far. It's only one page that I had modified till date and only one specific content from the page I have been trying to remove/correct and also closely monitoring on a periodic basis and still me being categorized as Vandal. Kindly check if you will be able to remove my block. Also, kindly note, regarding the particular content that I have removed, the mentioned artist never disclosed such details in any public platform verbally or by other means, and it's only some online medias keeps on claiming such details in their respective platform and we have been noticing that some experienced editors in wikipedia is copy pasting such details from unreliable sources and this act seems to be extremely unprofessional. Please revisit these points..Would be really helpful... Kind Regards, Ratz Wiki Ratz wiki (talk) 14:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The stated reason for the block is making legal threats, which is not permitted on Wikipedia, but you do not address this in your request. While no one here can stop you or your organization from exercising any legal rights you might have in your country, you cannot make legal threats on Wikipedia. In addition, if you initiate a legal action that involves Wikipedia in some way, you cannot edit Wikipedia until the legal action is concluded. To be unblocked, you will need to withdraw your legal threats and/or indicate that any legal action you have initiated has concluded. If you wish to make an unblock request that involves sensitive personal information, you may use WP:UTRS to make your request privately. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You should re-read the large orange block notice. You were blocked for making legal threats, not for vandalism, so you should probably be talking about that, not complaining about being blocked for something you weren't blocked for. Don't modify the unblock request above, though. Respond below instead, please. Also, Shobana's adoption of at least one child has been covered by multiple sources the community generally considers reliable. If you wind up unblocked and you still think this content should be removed, you will need to argue that point at Talk:Shobana, since you have already attempted to remove this content multiple times and other members of the community have found your edits disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the update. But please note, there are some sensitive information that we strictly don't want to discuss in public through talk section or by other means. Seems like humanity doesn't exist here in wiki. Anyway thanks for your time. Regards, Ratz Wiki
- @Ratz wiki: If there is sensitive personal information that you have a problem with, you should contact the volunteers at WP:VRT. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Okay, Will check with Boing! said Zebedee (talk) . But it seems that I have no edit permission anywhere other than my talk section. May be lack of my experience here. Could you please suggest how I can reach him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratz wiki (talk • contribs) 15:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know if there is a better email address, but according to Wikipedia:Contact us/Readers,
"You can also email the Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team at info-en-o@wikimedia.org, although we may not be able to assist with all suggestions. That list is managed by a small group of volunteers. If you do email, please include the address or title of the article and a description of the issue. Note that this volunteer team cannot assist you in writing entirely new articles, answering questions about things not found on Wikipedia, or resolving disputes about content."
Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Okay friend. Thanks much. I shall write separately to info-en-o@wikimedia.org to help us out. Kindly note, no legal actions were initiated from our side regarding the subject matter. So would you be able to remove the block? We will make the required edit through info-en-o@wikimedia.org. Regards.
Ratz wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Kindly check is there any way the block has been revoked from my profile. Hope the complete history of the concern is clear from the above section and we were no that experienced in wiki editing and hence the whole confusion. Could someone please check this unblock request
Decline reason:
You need to very clearly state that you do not intend to take any sort of legal action, and show that you understand our policy on making legal threats to get unblocked. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ratz wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, as I explained earlier, we were not much familiar with wiki editing and was unsure about a few things which caused this block. Kindly note, there is no legal action from our side with this regards. Hope this declaration would be enough to revoke the block. Also, we understand the process flow in wiki. Regards
Decline reason:
Who are you referring to when you say "we"? Are you royalty? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ratz wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I rephrased. Kindly check. I was not much familiar with wiki editing and was unsure about a few things which caused this block. Kindly note, there is no legal action from my side with this regards. Hope this declaration would be enough to revoke the block. Also, I understand the process flow in wiki. Regards
Decline reason:
You have not explained your understanding of our legal threats policy. Per your inability to respond to these questions and other concerns, I am declining unblock and revoking talk page access. only (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I think CaptainEek was very clear about what you would need to do to be unblocked, and yet you still seem to have trouble following those directions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi User:Cyphoidbomb, Thanks for your time. I do not intend to take any legal actions. Hope this is clear from my previous unblock requests. I do not know what else I have to state explicitly. Please guide me.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
The article Jagadeesh V Viswam has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 02:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Jagadeesh V Viswam for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagadeesh V Viswam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
—twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 07:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)