User talk:RedKnight 1
|
Your Mass Deletion[edit]
If you do not explain the mass deletion on Seymour Expedition, with a detailed explanation of how i twisted every single reference i used, i will revert your deletion and report you.Дунгане (talk) 05:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Give me Time to respond(a day). I am Busy at the moment(I do have a life), however I do have a rebuttal. Just be patient. RedKnight 1 (talk) 06:45, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- When you do reply, I would suggest that you do so in much more a collegiate tone than has been complained of. LessHeard vanU (talk) 10:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Copying content from one article to another[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Boxer Rebellion into Seymour Expedition. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
ANI discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Дунгане (talk) 20:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rising Sun Flag. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 07:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I added new item in rising sun flag's talk page. I want to hear your opinion. Thank you! --Mishichan (talk) 08:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 06:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yunshui 雲水 06:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 21:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yunshui 雲水 21:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
August 2013[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rising Sun Flag. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Rising Sun Flag, you may be blocked from editing. Please see the article talk page and answer my questions. Oda Mari (talk) 09:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Themes of The Heart of Darkness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Obscurity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Rising Sun Flag[edit]
Since another user has objected to your very substantial changes to [[Rising Sun Flag], you need to go to Talk:Rising Sun Flag and discuss them; Oda Mari has already opened a section there. Please note that I personally have no opinion on whether the older or newer version is correct, but I do know that once an editor objects to a major change, it's up to the person suggesting the major change to engage in discussion. Simply trying to force your way is edit warring. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Please consider this a final warning. If you revert to your preferred version again before obtaining consensus on the article's talk page, I will request that your account be blocked. Even if you are certain you are right, you must work within our dispute resolution processes to obtain consensus; perhaps even there is some sort of compromise that can be reached. Forcing your way will never be successful, because eventually you'll be blocked and then no one will even be able to listen to your arguments. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Why did u remove the major figure of sino-japanese war?[edit]
Hey why did u removed it? It shows the main generals or commander of China & Japan Wade T.Y. Lin (talk) 19:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
November 2018[edit]
Your addition to Person of color has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, RedKnight 1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of List of major figures of the Second Sino-Japanese War for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of major figures of the Second Sino-Japanese War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of major figures of the Second Sino-Japanese War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Loafiewa (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Restoring challenged content[edit]
Please do not restore challenged content. WP:ONUS is very clear here: "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." Neutralitytalk 14:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)