User talk:Redhill54

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Redhill54, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! GlassCobra 02:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Riograndense Republic

An article that you have been involved in editing, Riograndense Republic, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riograndense Republic. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-minor edits to Louisiana

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Louisiana, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. -- Ken g6 (talk) 19:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flag changes

I have mentioned your continued pattern of editing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Athletics. Trackinfo (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mato Grosso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mixed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Ledebour has been accepted

Georg Ledebour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+/– column

Hello Redhill54. You'll see that I've reverted your edit on German federal election, 1930. We do not require the sum of the +/– column to be equal to zero, so there is no need to insert parties that did not contest the elections, nor misleading figures (like the 4 you added for the Conservative Party). If a party didn't contest the previous election, it's marked "New" in that column. Cheers, Number 5 7 21:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Number57. I do not understand what you said about the sum of the +/- column being equal to zero, as the sum of the changes to the parties should surely be equal to the change in the total. This will not often be zero for the German federal election results, which have a variable number of seats in the chamber. It is also necessary to show parties that cease to put up candidates, as otherwise the change in the overall number of seats cannot be explained in the table for one election. I am not sure why the figure for the Conservative People's Party, (not the Conservative Party), was misleading. What wrong conclusion could someone draw from knowing that they had no deputies before an election, and 4 after it?

With a comment column, both parties putting up candidates for the first time, and ceasing to do so, can be shown, and the figures for seat number changes will be internally consistent. So why do we not do that, and ensure that all the information is provided? I hope this suggestion helps. Redhill54 (talk) 21:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say it would be equal to zero, I said that it does not have to be equal to zero (and in most cases for numerous countries it isn't - see Danish general election, 2015 as a recent example - the sum is not zero because the Alternative party (9 seats) is new). Similarly, we do not list parties that did not contest elections in the results table (as they didn't run). The reason the Conservative figure is misleading is because the options are +4, –4 or New. Just putting 4 is misleading as it's meaningless.

If you are seeking to note that parties are no longer around, I suggest the best thing to do is to add it to the prose in the article. Cheers, Number 5 7 22:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You do not seem to have explained what is wrong with wanting the tables to be internally consistent. If the sum of the changes in the parties' figures is not equal to the change in the total, the reader of the table has to do extra work to understand why that is the case. This might be by looking at the previous election figures, or by going to the article on the party, if one exists. More likely is that the reader will lose confidence in the data in the table, or the article. I presume that we want the articles to provide explanation, not cause bewilderment or irritation.

The main reason I was working on these tables was actually differences between versions in different languages, and that did reveal that there was a substantial amount of corrections needed. I am quite happy to add a comments column where changes in seats are shown and parties are appearing or disappearing, which would help the tables to provide all the information in one place, and ensure that the sum of the changes in the parts will always equal the change in the total. This would also require plus and minus signs for all changes, so thanks for pointing out that I missed one. Would that not be satisfactory to all of us? Redhill54 (talk) 22:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In more than ten years of us producing results tables on Wikipedia, no-one (as far as I'm aware) has previously felt the need to get the seat change column to equal zero - we don't do it, and I see no reason to change that, nor to add another column (the tables are already wide enough as it is, and any ecplanatory column may well lead to it breaking over two rows. As I said, this informatiom can easily be provided in prose format without messing up our standard tabular layout/format. Cheers, Number 5 7 23:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Athletics Happy New Year

Wishing you a Happy New Year on behalf of WikiProject Athletics! You can read of some of the project's achievements this year at the project talk page (please feel free to add your own thoughts and achievements!). SFB 18:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Redhill54. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Redhill54. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Redhill54. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missing reference in "Drinking water quality in the United States"

Greetings and felicitations. FYI: In your recent edit of Drinking water quality in the United States you added the named reference tag <ref name=WHO2016/> but seem to have never have defined it. It's causing an error message, so I just ask that you please either define it or delete the tag, at your convenience. —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]