User talk:Redpanther897

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Redpanther897! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- NMChico24 21:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Possible Copyright Violation

Illick's Mill Partnership

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Illick's Mill Partnership, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.illicksmill.org/main.php?page=historyofillicksmill. As a copyright violation, Illick's Mill Partnership appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Illick's Mill Partnership has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Illick's Mill Partnership. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Illick's Mill Partnership, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. NMChico24 21:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Regarding illicks Mill Partnership

Your Post: --panther [(*)(*)] 21:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)--panther [(*)(*)] 21:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC) I'm in the Illick's mill partnership, and have authority regarding posting its material on wikipedia.[reply]

NMChico24's Response: The material needs to be released into the public domain as per the GFDL. If you are releasing the material as such, please post your concerns at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Thank you! — NM Chico24 21:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Illick's Mill Partnership

To indicate that the copyright holder permits the use of this text under the GFDL, either:

Make a note on the source website that reuse of the text is permitted under the GFDL, and state here where we can find that note; or
Send an email from an address associated with the source website, to permissions at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation.

You must revise it to be in an encyclopedic tone and follow the Wikipedia article layout. Whispering^(talk/c) 23:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say your name and all the relevant information. And it is permissions @ Wikimedia . org not info. Whispering^(talk/c) 23:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a FYI make sure you sign all your posts with ~~~~ . Whispering^(talk/c) 23:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Mill-logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mill-logo.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a web hosting service

Hi -- the Illick's Mill partnership looks like a neat project (checked out your website), but do be aware that Wikipedia is not a webhosting service. Your article needs to be written like it would be in an encyclopedia, not in an advert or the yellow pages, otherwise someone will assuredly flag it for deletion... --Bookgrrl 02:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Illick's Mill article

I've moved the article to your userspace at User:Redpanther897/Illick's Mill Project so that you can work on it there. Please make sure you finish the page, remove copyright notices, and supply the proper GFDL licenses before putting the page back in the article space. NawlinWiki 13:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having been involved in tagging the article, I'd like to suggest an important change that you need to make (I just checked your temp page). The copyright statement at the top of the page won't be acceptable. Please read Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License. All text on Wikipedia is supposed to be licensed under GFDL, which states that you cannot added limitations. Also, large logos are inappropriate (a small thumbnail off to the side, like White Star Line works, though), and any web links need to go at the bottom under an "external links" header. Please let me know if you need any specific help. Also, the text needs to be written as if written by an outside person (First person language, like "Our watershed" is not appropriate in an encyclopedia article). It has to be written as objectively and dispassionately as possible, like you're a reporter with no personal interest. Akradecki 17:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]