User talk:Riaft

Welcome!

Hello, Riaft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stone Broken

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stone Broken requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Stone Broken, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stone Broken

A tag has been placed on Stone Broken requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:A7. Also page was just deleted 4 days ago.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you have created this page... Can I suggest trying Articles for Creation instead?? --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08: I have created this page because you pointed out that I had not followed the specified guidelines when I attempted to do so previously, so you deleted the page. I created a very basic page this time and ensured I adhered to all the guidelines and followed your advice. Stone Broken is a new British rock band who have received a great deal of press coverage and came runners-up in the 'best new band' category voted for by the biggest National rock radio station in the UK. Their profile is very similar to that of another new band called Inglorious, who have a very similar Wikipedia page which has not been deleted. Could you please clarify if the Stone Broken page has been deleted this time because I have not provided 'credible indication of importance'? Many thanks. Riaft (talk) 12:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Stone Broken, from its old location at User:Riaft/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Broken has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stone Broken. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stone Broken (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stone Broken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stone Broken, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Riaft! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Broken has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stone Broken. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Broken has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stone Broken. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Broken has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stone Broken. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stone Broken (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stone Broken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stone Broken, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Broken has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, saying: Enough has now been added to the article to make it seem likely that he's notable, especially the top 40, so I am going to accept. c Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stone Broken has been accepted

Stone Broken, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 18:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]