User talk:Ricksy

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! <font="center" color="#FFFFFF"> Keithology Talk! 13:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Collett

A link shouldn't be delinked because it points to the wrong article - it should be modified so that it points to the right article or, if there is no relevant article as yet, changed to become a red link for the time being. Normally we don't put "Sir" in the titles of articles about knights. However, it is acceptable to do so in order to disambiguate between two people with the same name, one of whom has been knighted and the other hasn't. Hope this is clear. Cheers. -- Necrothesp 19:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tuddy

Hiya, I noticed your edit summary on Tuddy (talk · contribs) about "prior disruptive author". Can you fill me in? I've noticed that he's creating dozens of articles about non-notable shopping centers... Is there a movement to try and stop this? Because if so, I'm in. :) --Elonka 21:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recognition

Thanks very much for your help in editing (date fix in merge template, stranded heading, changed list to defs) my article Emergency warning system for vehicles. Being new to WP I'm currently a bit overwhelmed with all the information rules and regulations to speedily compose and complete an article. Fine support indeed! Best --Lperez2029 23:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

BTW, if you have thoughts about the merge, please participate at Talk:Telematics? I'd welcome more input. :) --Elonka 03:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

re: Ann o. baskins - PROD does not apply to redirects. Also, the closure decision for the original redirect still applies even though the target has been moved. Fixing the double redirect is trivial and does not require deletion. Alternative names (middle initials, nicknames, etc.) are one of the primary usages for redirects. It is also standard practice to keep (though not to actively create) redirects based upon lowercase capitalization to facilitate people who type article titles directly into their browser's address bar.

In that case they'll get Ann O. Baskins by executing wp ann o. baskins - expedited by Firefox. --Ricksy 08:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, we do not actively create such redirects, but once someone makes a mistake & creates one, we don't bother deleting them either as people often make the same mistake. If it saves them doing a search, then it's helpful. As for your edit summary, neither of these cases are found in the reasons for deletion section, but both are found in reasons for keep section (2 & 4).

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt on your last escapade. Moving Ann o. baskins to 'Ann O. Baskins' and then nominating the original for {{db-author}} could be seen as an improper attempt to bypass the result of a closed deletion discussion. I have deleted 'Ann O. Baskins' as an unlikely typo as it's not worth cleaning up, but in the future do not attempt such circumvention again. If you believe a deletion decision was reach improperly, then use deletion review. Otherwise, you need to respect community consensus on deletion policy & procedures. -- JLaTondre 12:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Talk:Penny Smith - The closure decision was to blank the redirect and not delete. Many times, articles are moved and the resultant redirect is changed to a dab page. The talk page redirect can simply be blanked and does not need to be actually deleted. Someone went ahead and deleted it, but it wasn't necessary. Blanking the redirect is the typical practice in these cases and doesn't even need to go through RFD in the first place.

Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 02:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Talk:William Franklyn/junk - I've deleted this as {{db-talk}} as there was no content, but there was really no reason to move it from Talk:William Franklyn in the first place. Your rationale on the move was "no notable content (spam), start afresh". You didn't have to move it (or have it deleted) to do that. You could have simply edited the page and replaced what was there. There is no need to create extra work. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 03:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lasting 1st impressions of Wikipedia

Before I signed up here, one of the things that struck me was the sheer number of people who have left the project. For various reasons, they decided time spent here could well be put to better use. I'm beginning to think that way myself. --Ricksy 07:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Wishing you the best for the holidays and a Happy New Year. I want to thank you for your continued support to the project, and more specifically for welcoming me to Wikipedia and helping me with my articles. Best regards --Lperez2029 18:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind holiday words, and Happy New Year to you too! :) --El on ka 19:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ITV Play playdate.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ITV Play playdate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Katie Bramall

A tag has been placed on Katie Bramall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Illinois2011 22:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

R. P. Lumber

Yes, you are right. I did flag the article Katie Bramall within one minute of creation. The gameshow contestant is not notable. Although, now that I look at it, I should have used G4, recreation of deleted material. I find it quite entertaining that while you are upset about this, you go to flag an article that I have contributed heavily to (although did not write myself) R. P. Lumber. I didn't mean this as a personal attack against you, the person just isn't notable. R. P. Lumber, however, is a huge hardware company in the U.S. State of Illinois. The article certainly needs some copyediting, but it deserves to be on Wikipedia. Please refrain from revenge attacks. Best regards! Illinois2011 20:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed new policy

As a recent contributor to Deaths in 2009, you may be able to help decide on a proposed new policy. It is proposed that:

A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.

Please opine at Talk:Deaths_in_2009#Proposed new policy. Don't just say

Support.

or

Oppose.

Also state your reasons and participate in the discussion. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:March 2009

Sorry about that, I have a bad habit of that (I know, three years here and I should know better :( ). I just often redirect whenever a character changes his/her name via marriage or adoption the minute it the name change comes on screen.

Conquistador2k6 1 April 2009 10:36 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rob Williams (entrepreneur)

The article Rob Williams (entrepreneur) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

wikipedea in not the news and is not a memorial

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rob Williams (entrepreneur)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rob Williams (entrepreneur). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Williams (entrepreneur). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laura Van Der Heijden

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Laura Van Der Heijden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 19:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ricksy. You have new messages at Gourami Watcher's talk page.
Message added 19:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 19:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Finals

Some of us were listening to the programme - I've moved Laura to (cellist), added a bit to the article. stubbed it and sorted out the link at BBC Young Musician. OK? Peridon (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for contributing to Laura. (The article started in title case when I cut and paste the name over from the BBC biography page. I found a namesake already had a page when I tried to match the style on her website.) Undone your move by mistake; meant to place page over redirect left where I shifted the other Laura), but it was rejected, needing an admin's intervention.

Done - conflicting articles sorted now. With regards. --Ricksy (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bloodlines (film)

The article Bloodlines (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to establish Wikipedia:Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mais oui! (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bloodlines (ITV drama), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cullen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for LBC 97.3

An article that you have been involved in editing, LBC 97.3, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khairul Islam (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ricksy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ricksy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE re 185.108.105.0/24

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ricksy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Could some1 please grant me an exception, namely (“An editor in good standing is permitted to edit anonymously when they can demonstrate the need”), so I may get back to a piece I picked up from the time I last tried, see Brewster (police dog) here. I'm not a party to any of (14) contribs by all other IP editors of its range; just an impacted contributor (enrolled in 2006, without the hindsight to pursue ad-ministership).

Decline reason:

The instructions for requesting IPBE in order to edit via a blocked proxy / VPN can be found at WP:IPECPROXY. The range you cite is IOMart Cloud Services Limited. SQL ^{Query me!} 18:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You must fill in your IP address for this block to be investigated.

I am logged in to make this request, as advised. Over weekend worked fine. --Ricksy (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]