User talk:RobertCrip

Welcome!

Hello, RobertCrip, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:John Price, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Laun chba ller 21:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:John Price. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Just Chilling (talk) 23:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Douglass, you may be blocked from editing. Just Chilling (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vangsås

Regarding your edit at Vangsås; geographic stub articles are not spam. Please don't template them for deletion claiming that they are. General Ization ^Talk 02:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your User page

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 20:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Filthy Frank, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 22:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Filthy Frank. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 22:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Onision. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. General Ization ^Talk 23:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon? What exactly is contentious according to you? RobertCrip (talk) 23:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As just one example, everything you added to this article was contentious and requires sourcing under Wikipedia's policies concerning biography of living persons. See the links in my messages to you above for information on those policies. (Though after ten years one would think you would already know them very well. Might I ask what previous username you used for most of those years?). General Ization ^Talk 23:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I put several reliable sources on the article and still I don't get how it's "controversial"? And the last thing you brought up is totally irrelevant to the subject right now. RobertCrip (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia.com, YouTube and Reddit are not reliable sources for allegations of rape, claims concerning religion and assertions of pedophilia in WP:BLPs. Again, read the policies linked above if you don't understand them. Repeat the edits and they will be reverted. And my question to you is indeed relevant, and I suspect you know why. General Ization ^Talk 23:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube source?? Nope. I disagree on the fact that wikia is NOT a reliable source. It's definitely authentic and genuine in it's own way. And repeating edits is doltish. RobertCrip (talk) 23:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to inquire at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. In the meantime, do not add information to biographies of living persons here without citing a reliable source. General Ization ^Talk 23:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it multiple times and i understand the concept. RobertCrip (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. Then I will assume if you violate the policies again that it is neither because you haven't read them or do not understand them. General Ization ^Talk 23:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let me interrogate. Why did you revert the edit where I put Filfthy Franks birth date. Was that obligatory? RobertCrip (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, dates of birth require citation, as explained in the policies you just acknowledged. General Ization ^Talk 23:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you're jesting with me? This is clearly conspicuous. If you search Filthy Frank on Google, the first thing that comes up is his birth date. If you can't accept this, then I don't know what to tell ya. RobertCrip (talk) 23:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to tell me anything. See WP:BURDEN. And no, I'm not jesting with you. General Ization ^Talk 23:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's good to hear. RobertCrip (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to James Kirkwood Sr.. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:RobertCrip

User:RobertCrip, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:RobertCrip and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:RobertCrip during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 07:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flemingsberg Church for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flemingsberg Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flemingsberg Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion with RobertCrip

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with RobertCrip. What you say here will be public for others to see.

Start a discussion