User talk:RobertNesbit
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:55, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Client-Directed Outcome-Informed Therapy/Partners for Change Outcome Management System.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 08:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Partners for Change Outcome Management System.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Partners for Change Outcome Management System.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) DCS 08:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, RobertNesbit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Shearonink (talk) 01:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Some more links...
[edit]- Your first article
- Referencing for beginners
- Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)
- WIkipedia:Notability
- Reliable sources
- Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
Hope this helps, Shearonink (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Help request
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I'm working on a draft of a stub for an article I began about a year ago. I've attempted to shorten and use primarily external sources. Where should I submit it for an initial edit before submitting it as a formal article?RobertNesbit (talk) 00:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Based on the top of the page, you've already found WP:Articles for Creation. That's still the best place to go, imo. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
{{help me}} I recently submitted a draft of an article that was declined. While the subject may not be notable enough for an entire article, would it possibly be a candidate for a stub? And, if so, how would I go about submitting it as a stub? Thank you!
- Hi Robert. A "stub" is simply a way of describing a short and not yet well-developed article; it is in no way a separate type of thing. This means that if the subject is not suitable for an article, this inherently includes not being appropriate as a stub, since that just describes a phase in an article's development. Keep looking for independent, reliable, third party sources discussing the topic and write it as neutrally as possible and resubmit. You might also post to the WP:Help desk or maybe the WP:Teahouse/Questions asking people there to help.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 05:11, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
{{Help me-helped}} Thank you. This has been very helpful. Another question I have is whether textbooks are qualified as reliable, third party sources? Additionally, is there a certain number of sources a subject needs in order to qualify as notable?RobertNesbit (talk) 22:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Generally yes, with a caveat or two. Note that, per WP:SOURCES (emphasis added)
...Other reliable sources include university-level textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers. ...
- One caveat is to note the qualifier "university-level"
- A second caveat is that, to the surprise of some, textbooks are often not subject to any formal peer-review, so do not enjoy the same stature as academic and peer-reviewed publications on the same subject matter. Finally, it might depend on the subject matter, as there may be some textbooks covering fringe issues which might not be acceptable. In you want a specific response on a specific textbook, you can post a request at WP:RSN--SPhilbrick(Talk) 23:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Partners for Change Outcome Management System.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk|contrib) 20:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)