User talk:Robmillernow

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Occupy Wall Street has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 06:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think my contribution was in any way unconstructive. I understand I may not have formatted it correctly - i admit my ignorance - but the information is sound. Please return the lines I wrote and reference this link. I'm sorry for any inconvenience I've caused. I'm only interested in getting correct information out there. The Top Google Search for Occupy Wall Street Demands is delivering a forum post that the media and blogs are really mocking. Putting this entry up will help set the record straight -- isn't that what wikipedia is for? Robmillernow (talk) 07:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on the Occupy protests. They are unbiased, but very informative. Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 22:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ice Lake Rebels (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ice Lake Rebels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Robmillernow, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ice Lake Rebels has been accepted

Ice Lake Rebels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 21:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Masem (t) 00:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Apprentice (American TV series). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please be aware that, regardless of editor's intentions, the amount of disruption surrounding the topic means that editors who don't take advice to back off will be blocked. Sorry to be blunt, but too much time is spent in that area for niceties. Johnuniq (talk) 02:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 03:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]