Jump to content

User talk:Rocketpipe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rocketpipe, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Rocketpipe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Mahoning Valley Steel Company

[edit]

Hello Rocketpipe,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Mahoning Valley Steel Company for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. no. I presume if your intent was advertising, you would have used more current info than 100ya. I've declined the speedy deletion and rewrote to past tense. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I always intended further work on the page to bring the quality up. Speedy deletion seems a bit harsh. Is the some way to mark a page a "work in progress".

You could move it to Draft space. There is less community exposure so less help available, but it is also lees likely to be tagged for deletion. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Rocketpipe, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

a word about user pages

[edit]

You might want to look at Wikipedia:Userboxes#Gallery as a means of telling colleagues about yourself.

Wikipedia:User page design center has information that can help you design a user page.


Additional tips...

 -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GE 645, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTSS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Single sign-on, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADFS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rocketpipe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Laws of association, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 06:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the comment, but i would like to understand how the insertion violated the style guide so i can fix it. The source of a comment in the existing page is very weak, so i included the part of the source that was referenced in the existing page. Is there a way to do it that meets the style guide? Rocketpipe (talk) 14:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You added content after the reference section, per MOS:ORDER Article content should be before the appendices (references). Also if you quote something you should add an inline citation, See Help:Referencing for beginners for help with that. Nobody (talk) 15:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]