User talk:Roi.eco

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wild Asia’s Responsible Tourism Awards (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.pata.org/tag/mario-hardy, http://rt.wildasia.org/responsible-tourism-awards/about-the-awards/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Wild Asia’s Responsible Tourism Awards may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 05:14, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Roi.eco, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 05:14, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roi.eco. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Lionratz (talk) 11:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Roi.eco, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing

In Draft:Wild Asia’s Responsible Tourism Awards, which you created, not only were substantial pieces of text copied word-for-word from another source, in violation of copyright, but also the text was unambiguously promotional: it read as though it was written by someone who wished to persuade us that the awards are a good thing. Such promotional editing is contrary to Wikipedia policy. It may be that you did not intend to promote the awards, and that the promotional tone of the page was a result of copying from a web site which was trying to promote the awards. If so, that is another reason for not copying from other web sites, apart from copyright, since pages on an organisation's own web site are rarely written from a neutral point of view. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make (which you will, because we all do) will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Infofuture, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Icewhiz (talk) 13:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png

Thanks for uploading File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png

The file File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image of a unnotable topic that has since been [[Global Sustainable Tourism Council

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC)

Hello, Roi.eco. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Global Sustainable Tourism Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.gstcouncil.org/costa-rica-cst-standard-gstc-recognized-standard/ https://www.gstcouncil.org/about/about-us/ https://www.gstcouncil.org/certification/accreditation-certification-recognition/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Global Sustainable Tourism Council and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Global Sustainable Tourism Council, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Global Sustainable Tourism Council. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Global Sustainable Tourism Council with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Global Sustainable Tourism Council saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, why did you remove the COI disclosure from your user-page? Unless you never had a COI, I think you should restore it. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify your COI situation, especially since you have edited the article of a competitor organization, The International Ecotourism Society. —C.Fred (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Justlettersandnumbers and C.Fred, COI restored. All edits to other Wikipedia pages, that are not indicated in my COI, are done by myself in my own free time, without relationship or affiliation to the organization of which its Wikipedia page is mention in my COI.

@C.Fred: there was no and there is no competition between the two organizations. 1:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

All the same, it may be prudent if you avoid editing the TIES article directly, especially since there are some other editors who appear to have connections with TIES or a pro-TIES bias. It will make the matter easier to sort out. —C.Fred (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]