Jump to content

User talk:Rycka198centimeters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Pakstys7. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Richard Kleiman, from its old location at User:Pakstys7/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Pakstys7. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 17:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Kleiman (May 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pakstys7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rycka198centimeters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pakstys is my last name, I wasn't trying to violate the naming rules. This was a misunderstanding as I thought I was making a draft for 35 Ventures when I was actually editing my talk page. I think you guys thought that I was describing my company in the talk page, which is not the case. I am simply a new Wikipedia editor who got on the wrong side of a misunderstanding.

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rycka198centimeters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was a misunderstanding as I thought I was making a draft for 35 Ventures and Richard Kleiman when I was actually editing my talk page. I think you guys thought that I was describing my company in the talk page, which is not the case. I am simply a new Wikipedia editor who got on the wrong side of a misunderstanding. Pakstys7 (talk) 15:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

globally renamed Pakstys7 to Rycka198centimeters

[edit]

globally renamed Pakstys7 to Rycka198centimeters --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

[edit]

I think if you're agreeing to not write about your business or any connected subject we can unblock you. Must consult with @Jimfbleak: --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please describe what constructive edits you'd make. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra, I think the wording above is a bit vague, and I'd be happier for this editor to make it absolutely clear that they won't write about their company, but, as always, happy to leave it in your capable hands Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rycka198centimeters (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Hi guys, thank you for the name change![reply]

I have zero intention about writing about a company I am employed by or a company I own or to make a page about myself, but to be clear I do intend to make pages 35 Ventures and Rich Kleiman because I think they are famous enough. I am not remotely associated with either and have no intention on violating any Wikipedia rules

Rycka198centimeters (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC) Hello, I don't mean to be impatient, but it's been a short while since I've heard anything regarding my unban and I just want to make sure that I haven't lost my place in line or anything. Once again, I am not working for this company and this is far from advertising. I learned my lesson and it would be amazing to be able to contribute along side you Wikipedia people. Thanks upfront! :)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rich Kleiman (1) (June 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 12:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rich Kleiman (1) (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:13, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rich Kleiman (1) (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rich Kleiman has been accepted

[edit]
Rich Kleiman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rycka198centimeters&oldid=1191728713"