User talk:S4r4hjanecowen

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 14:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sportingbet South Africa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened a content discussion at Talk:Sportingbet South Africa. Please discuss why you think the redirect is inappropriate. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

S4r4hjanecowen, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi S4r4hjanecowen!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Netbet

Hello S4r4hjanecowen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Netbet for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 12:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]