User talk:SN Pushkarna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Why are you want hide Pandit lek Ram and Arya Samaj History from qadian Page is it not ture that that Dav institutes are working in qadian under the Guidelines of Arya Samaj

Are they not the citizen of Qadian

are the Muslim are the only citizens of qadian

Please revert on the wikipedia

October 2014[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at WP:Vandalism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vandalising a page on Vandalism is not a smart move if you want to continue to be able to edit Wikipedia. noq (talk) 10:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


Why this warning What The wrong has done from my side ,you are the based One

This is the must to provide complete History of the city ,You can't delete the History from the page

Else Name this as Muslim page

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
I gave you the benefit of the doubt here in giving you a finite block. I was torn between whether to do that or simply block your account indefinitely until you give us some indication that you will stop disrupting Wikipedia. (It was so close that, frankly, if another administrator decided I had made the wrong choice and extended your block, I would not argue with them.) This is your second block for disruption, and any future issues are likely to lead to an indefinite block.
You simply cannot work on Wikipedia this way. The best result you will wind up with is that editing of the article you are disputing will be blocked from everyone in the form you don't want it to be in. When you disagree with other editors, you must resolve your differences within policy and allowed protocols. See Wikipedia:Dispute resolution, familiarize yourself with our core content policies (WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR), and be prepared when the block expires to work with others to explain why you think the material you want in the article meets those policies. If you do not, if you return to the behavior you exhibited today, you will be blocked again, likely without warning. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:54, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


{{unblock}}


Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock }}

Have Wiki Confirmed the history

Or Just blocking the voice of common Citizens voice Over The Group of some community Lobby

We will recommend that wiki is not providing the true history

There is no entity called "Wiki." Wikipedia is a project put together by thousands of regular people from around the world - people like you, who work hard. Sometimes articles need improvement. If you think an article needs improvement, you are welcome to help improve it, but you have to work with people. What you have done here is the equivalent to me of getting mad at a display in a public museum and knocking over tables and exhibitions all around to try to force people to make it the way you want. It's not acceptable here or, I hope, anywhere. You can work with people to hopefully try to reach an unbiased and accurately sourced article. But if you vandalize the project as you blatantly did there to express your displeasure, the only problem anybody is going to see is you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SN Pushkarna (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

This bull Shit ,as you are hiding the truth from the Pages ,you can get the blocked ,no needs to un-block me as if you un-block ,i will keep spreading the truth on this page ,This is the lobbing of one community to hide the history from the page .Tell me, whet the Wrong i have written on this page ,Is the arya Samaj's History of Qadian is not acceptable to you and Wiki .. is this wrong that DAV Institute are working in Qadian ,Or Is this wrong that Pandit lek Ram Foot print are on the Qadian's Soil ,prove me Wrong

Decline reason:

In the context of your lack of competence, and your incivility, I am declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 12:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Listing the schools in an education section would be fine but that is not what you are doing, you are putting a potted history of the DAV movement here which is nt appropriate. You are adding descriptions to the notable people that are not necessary - the linked pages go into that. You are adding a link to Pandit Lekh Ram who's only connection appears to be with someone from Qadian which is a very tenuous reason to make them notable for Qadian. We don't have to prove you wrong, you have to provide WP:reliable sources to back up your claims rather than through your toys about when someone questions it's appropriateness. noq (talk) 11:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


{{unblock}}


{{unblock}}

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SN Pushkarna (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

As i was the victim of discrimination This page is the volition of Human Rights The Right to express as a group of few people are editing this to there way and blocking the truth ,name this page the Qadian the Muslim Community page That will be the better ,so that other community can make there on page as provide the other side of the history SN Pushkarna (talk) 12:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC) f the philosophy and principles of Arya Samaj that was founded by the great visionary Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati in 1875. Pt Lekh Ram is one of the three contemporaries - Swami Shraddhanand who founded Gurukul kangri, Pt. Guru Datt who wrote such matchless books that found a respectable place in Oxford University, DharamVeer Pt. Lekh Ram who wrote Kuliat Musafir that became the most authentic document on religion. Pt. Lekh Ram was born on 8th.Of Chaitra 1915 in the village Saiyad Pur in the Jhelum district of Punjab. His father was Tara Singh and the mother was Bhag Bhari. He was influenced by the writings of Munshi Kanhaiya Lal Alakhdhari and came to know about Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati and Arya Samaj.He founded Arya Samaj at Peshawar. He also published a paper Dharmopdesh. He resigned from his government job and devoted himself whole heartedly to writng and speaking for the propagation of the the ideals of Arya Samaj and Vedic Dharma. He became a preacher of Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Punjab. He also vowed to write the authentilc life history of Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati. For this, he travelled far and wide and produced a detailed account of the life of the founder of Arya Samaj. He established his view point so forcefully that nobody dared to come forward to oppose. There is an interesting episode of his confrontations. Details are given on the following website, http://www.irshad.org/exposed/mubahalc.php According to the article on the quoted website, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani issued Mubhala to all or any Aryas. Muhabala is a kind of prayer challenge or curse that will result in a sever divine punishment on a liar. The key to understanding the mubahala resides in these words: "Seldom did two people enter a mutual cursing except the liar of the two became afflicted." "Last resort is Mubahala for which we have made a call earlier. For Mubahala, it is not necessary to be a scholar of the Vedas (Hindu religious books). Yes, he should be a well- mannered, renowned Arya who may also impress others. .............................................................. ........................ If they really think that 'Vedas' teachings which we have recounted in this pamphlet are correct and true and contrarily consider that the principles and teachings of Quran Shareef, also written by us in this very pamphlet, are wrong and untrue, then they may do Mubahala with us on this issue..... .... ......... ............................................. if our assertion is false Divine Distress and punishment may descend on us. In this way, the words contained in each of the two Mubahalas should be publicly verified for truthfulness, believing that Divine punishment must fall on the party who swears falsely. And there shall be a waiting period of one year for Divine Decision to come down. If after passage of one year Divine punishment falls on the writer of this pamphlet, or does not fall on the adversary, in either case, this humble self, shall suffer a fine of Rs.500/- . ................................................................................. Summarizing, One may note that: * Mirza challenged all the Aryas to a Mubahala; * Mirza would win if Divine Punishment befell upon his rival in one year's time; * Mirza would lose and pay a fine of Rs.500 to his rival if: If nothing untoward happened to his rival in one year's time or, Divine Fury befell upon Mirza, during this period, in both the cases, Mirza would be proved a liar. * Duration of this 'sporting event' was only one year; that is, all that was to happen must happen within one year. Pandit Lekh Ram accepts the challenge As a rejoinder to Mirza's pamphlet, Surma-e-Chashm-e-Arya, Pandit Lekh Ram wrote his Nuskha-e-Khabte Ahmadiya (Rais-e-Qadian, Vo1. 1, P. 121) in which he wrote his acceptance of the challenge in these words: "I humble, Lekh Ram, son of Pandit Tara Singh Sahib Sharma, Author of Takzeeb-e-Braheen-e-Ahmadiya and this pamphlet, (Nuskha-e-Khabte Ahmadiya) declare in soundness of all my senses and understanding that I have read the pamphlet Surma-e-Chashme Arya from beginning to end, not once but many times, having grasped its arguments fully and have published its reply in refutation in the light of Sat Dharam (true religion). In this pamphlet, the arguments of Mirza Sahib have not impressed me one bit because they are not righteously oriented. (After dilating on this subject the Pandit wrote in the end:) O, Permeshwar! (God) Make a decision between us truly, because never can a liar glorify in Thy Audience against the truthful. Writer: Your eternal slave, Lekh Ram Sharma, Sabhasud Arya Samaj, Peshawar, presently Editor, Arya Gazette, Ferozepur Punjab," (Roohani Khazain, Vol. 2, P. 326-332, Summary}. Finale in 1889 The Mubahala challenge of the Pandit was thrown in 1888. By the end of 1889, result was to be out as Mirza stipulated, but the year passed away and nothing happened. Pandit Lekh Ram lived much beyond 1889. Actually he died in 1897 and Mirza never paid him 500 Rupees. The Pandit knew he wouldn't, true to the couplet: "Knots of my purse, Oh, open them not." Epilogue: Divine Decision subjected Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani to disgrace before Pandit Lekh Ram, Hindu Arya. How shameful indeed! Pandit Lekh Ram died the death of a martyr on 6th.of March1897 from stab wounds a fanatic inflicted upon him. Pt. Lekh Ram wrote thirty three books. All his writings are in Urdu, but they have been translated in Hindi and some books have been translated in English and Sindhi too. The biography of this great preacher was written by Swami Shraddhanand. We should abide by his advice that Taqreer and Tehreer should continue from the platform of Arya Samaj. This article has been adopted from an article originally written by Dr. Dharam Pal Arya - Ex Vice-Chancellor, Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya The Martyr, Pt. Lekh Ram Lala Lajpat Rai https://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/.../name/Pt.+Lekhram-Great+Martyr.pdf

Decline reason:

I have read this three times, and all I can understand of it is that it does not address the reason for you being blocked. I would suggest you read WP:TLDR as not all admins will go to the trouble of reading so much text in a request. Keep it short, keep to the actual reason for blocking, and don't try to claim discrimination - we don't work like that. Peridon (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

If you want to be unblocked apologize then tell the admins that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead. YOu were blocked for distruptive editing, make it clear to admins and clarify in detail to make it clear to admins why you were blocked. Then convince them that you will not do it again, maybe read some wikipedia policies like WP:Disruptive editing and quote some things from it that you understand now that you didnt before.

In my opinion if you promise not to edit the page which caused your block for 48 hours... that may convince the admin, that certainly convinces me as an outsider

Be sincere but also be warned that you shouldnt request so many unblocks in a short time which are invalid or your ability to edit our own page will be removed

I am helping you as I was once in the same situation as you and made the big mistake of using Sockpuppets (another account to avoid block), dont do the same and just be patient even if your block is declined. Because if you use another account you can be blocked forever, and even if your a PC expert and change your IP and PC and whatever, you will still be blocked because they will "think" your that same previouslly blocked user as your behaviour will make them think this, see WP:The duck test, good luck--Misconceptions2 (talk) 20:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


p.s your "truth" data is being removed probably because its copy edited or not from a reliable source. If you want it to stay on wikipedia dont copy data exactly, rerwite it. Also try to get the data your looking for from Google books, search the text your looking for on google books. I havent checked your edits, but am assuming your edits were removed for those reasons

October 2014[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Qadian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. And you still persist in vandalism. You have obviously not learnt anything since your behaviour got you blocked last time. noq (talk) 10:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, SN Pushkarna. You have new messages at Noq's talk page.
Message added 09:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

noq (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SN Pushkarna (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

What ever i explain you will not accept ,that what is the purpose of that ,its up to you ,there is lobby at wiki that's want to hide the truth and useful historic information

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 04:43, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.


File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SN Pushkarna (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia

as we want that truth can be presented and you want to hide the true history


Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SN Pushkarna (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

you must be biased Religious person you want to hide the true history Is this not true that arya Samaj played the major role in Qadian and Qadian having major institutes working under this since 1919 and if yes than why you don't want to add this information on Wikipedia and if i was including same you keep me blocking That's why i declared this as Muslim page ,You can hide this information with the group of people History con't be changed if you don't include this on Wikipedia It's bull shit if you want to hide this SN Pushkarna (talk) 11:22 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

The sad thing is, you might actually have a valid point in there somewhere. However, it's clear from your talkpage history that the only way you know how to make your point is to throw tantrums and accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias and intolerance. That won't wash here. I don't see any likelihood of you becoming a productive editor any time soon, and since these unblock requests are themselves becoming disruptive, I have now revoked your access to edit this page. Yunshui  14:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

You will not get unblocked if your unblock requests persist in showing the very attitude that got you blocked in the first place. There is no religious conspiracy trying to prevent you from editing - you are causing the problems yourself by insisting on your version of truth without actually providing WP:reliable sources that WP:verify that. When these are reverted, you resort to blaming others and making up conspiracies against you. Please actually read what people are trying to tell you rather than just kicking out when you don't get what you want. noq (talk) 11:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)