User talk:SabaNaz

April 2017

Hello, I'm Sanket Edits Wiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Carol Gracias without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. **SEW** (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sanket Edits Wiki, there were three wrong attributes in the infobox. Wikipedia suggested me to remove them from infobox. SabaNaz (talk) 08:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB as a source

I noticed that you recently used IMDB as a source for information in a biography article. Please note that per long-standing consensus, IMDb and other celebrity databases do not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. You can read more about the reasons for this here, here and here.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jezebel's Ponyo Thanks. I will follow this next time. --*Saba Naz* (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Asking Reason of Block

Jezebel's Ponyo why you have blocked me? Where is my other account? --*Saba Naz* (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Where is my other account? Can you please clarify why I get blocked [[User:SabaNaz|*Saba Naz*]] ([[User talk:SabaNaz#top|talk]]) 18:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SabaNaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ponyo has blocked me without providing any evidence of multiple accounts. Please clarify which other accounts you have investigated against me? Why I have been banned from here? *Saba Naz* (talk) 18:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; no reason provided to believe the block is invalid. You are believed to be part of the IMZahidIqbal (talk · contribs) sock farm. For more information, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/IMZahidIqbal. Yamla (talk) 19:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain me how my account is relating with this banned/blocked user? *Saba Naz* (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla kindly explain how you are relating me with this banned user. *Saba Naz* (talk) 19:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not. Ponyo is the one who related you, based on checkuser evidence. --Yamla (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SabaNaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla you have declined my appeal to unblock. Please investigate this action of Ponyo and show me evidence how I am relating to this banned user IMZahidIqbal? I do not have any relation with this account.

Decline reason:

I am not a WP:CHECKUSER and do not have access to this information. Almost no admins do, for privacy reasons. Yamla (talk) 19:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

*Saba Naz* (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How you relate me with this banned user?

Ponyo Please explain to me how you relate me with this banned user? *Saba Naz* (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SabaNaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla If You cannot provide any evidence against me then why declining my unblock appeal again and again.

Ponyo please give evidence how I am relating to this banned user IMZahidIqbal? Why you have banned me, I do not have any relation with this account. --*Saba Naz* (talk) 19:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CheckUser is a tool that allows some of the most trusted members of the community to see technical information about editors including, but not limited to, IP addresses. For reasons of privacy CheckUser results generally are not published beyond an indication of certainty of a connection between accounts. If Ponyo confirmed that the accounts are related, other admins do not need to know the evidence but can rely on Ponyo's assessment, particularly when you offer nothing beyond "there's no relation", which is obviously incorrect. Huon (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SabaNaz, I declined the unblock request because you directed it at me. --Yamla (talk) 19:58, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If any reviewing admin would like further information regarding the evidence behind the block, please feel free to email me. Per WP:BEANS, I won't be expanding on the tells here.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SabaNaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ponyo has blocked me due to IP issues. My IP was used by a banned/sucketpuppet user. Now he given me exemptions from banned ips. Please restore my access.

Decline reason:

Ponyo has blocked this account directly; you aren't just caught by using the same IP as someone else. If Ponyo means to undo that, he can easily unblock it. He has not given you the IP block exemption user right; he rather argues just above that this account should remain blocked. Since you are now resorting to untruths in your unblock requests, I will remove talk page access. You can request an unblock from your original account. Huon (talk) 21:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

*Saba Naz* (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]