User talk:Samee/Archives/2018/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Samee. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please review this Draft
Just to refresh, you published my Article of Ahmadullah Shah. Thanks again for it.
Here is the new article from me. It's a 300 years old trust from Mumbai. Your kind review on the same will be highly appreciated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bombay_and_Bandra_Bakar_Kasai_Jamat_Mosques_Trust
-- Umair talk —Preceding undated comment added 11:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for publishing my Article. Will be more careful with Indicscripts in future.
New Years new page backlog drive
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
- The total number of reviews completed for the month.
- The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Is there any reason why suppress redirect was used? feminist (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Regarding Talk:Imperial cult (ancient Rome): It (talkpage move with suppression) was not done deliberately (was dealing with main space, associated talkpage was also affected). I was about to move back this title (Imperial cult of ancient Rome/temp) per WP:ROBIN. sami talk 16:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
RM
Hi Samee – with regard to your relisting of the requested move debate at Talk:List of professional sports leagues by revenue#Requested move 5 January 2018, you had relisted it shortly after it had been "officially" opened. This has played a little havoc with the RMCD bot, as you can see at the bottom of this table . I removed your relisting since it had been done the same day of the opening, so please wait until at least seven days have passed after a debate is opened before relisting the discussion. Thank you and Happy New Year! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 15:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. The now struck signatures at Talk:List of professional sports leagues by revenue#Requested move 5 January 2018 bemused me. Thanks again! sami talk 17:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
RM
Hi. Talk:University College of Osteopathy#Requested move 20 December 2017 was clearly a no consensus, or at best a relist. Please undo your close. James (talk/contribs) 14:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'd have no problem if you ask any administrator or any other user (at RM) to revert the closure. Thanks. sami talk 17:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
For record: The title was moved back. link 13:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Moin Nawaz Warraich
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Moin Nawaz Warraich. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Moin Nawaz Warriach. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Moin Nawaz Warriach. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Saqib (talk) 04:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- If someone has created pages with minor spelling mistakes in the title, one should correct the page title by renaming it instead of start creating new pages on the same topic. In Moin Nawaz Warriach case, I used the name spelling as per the data on the official website of Punjab Assembly so no mistake on my part. Further, you noted in your edit summary "One RS: Moin Nawaz Warraich". The sources can be expanded, but is not a valid reason to overtake the page over a new one which has unreliable sources such as "www.electionpakistani.com." Thank you. --Saqib (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- No mistake on my part as well. I didn't know that the article Moin Nawaz Warriach did exist (before this CSD A10 alert) otherwise I'd have moved it to Moin Nawaz Warraich instead of starting a new. samee talk 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) By one RS, I didn't mean that it contained one source. I mentioned one source to cite the spellings. samee talk 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I have created over 400 BLPs on Pakistani MPA's two days ago, and I assume many of them are not correctly titled. If you get some spare time and willing to correct the titles, please do to avoid re-creation of duplicate pages in the future. --Saqib (talk) 05:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sure thing! But I don't re-create habitually. samee talk 05:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've backed out your close of this AfD. It had just been relisted by an administrator, and the only vote after the relist was by a 7 edit SPA account that didn't even sign it's post. I've relisted it so that it can have an additional 7 days of discussion. Thanks. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Samee, I reverted your recent edit to Sardar Bahadur Ahmed Khan for the reason that I've plans to expand each and every BLP on Pakistani politician having similar structure to something like this. Hope you won't merge the information in rest of BLP's until I find enough time to work on them. Thank you. --Saqib (talk) 09:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome ...
... to QAI, the cabal of the outcasts ;) - We are merrily unorganized, feel free to use the talk to your liking, asking for help and giving help, such as reviewing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Obsessed
I am certainly not obsessed by undoing other users' edits. I usually make sure to examine the edits that I am going revert, but sometimes blunder do happen. I would appreciate if you could point out a few reverts of mine which were not justified. --Saqib (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
i want to give my car on rent i am in sheikhupura
When relisting is not necessary
Hi Samee,
I noticed that you relisted this move discussion. Generally, if there are no objections to a reasonable request for a page move, you can just perform the move; there is no minimum requirement for participation. The only reason to have the WP:RM process is for controversial discussions; if nobody else has seen fit to object, it can safely be assumed (barring any policy violations) that it is non-controversial. Have a great day, --Aervanath (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
What do you want to write about?
Hi Samee, The Draft which I have submitted is well-known actor in Kannada Movie Industry, Even I have included Kannada News Paper information, Kindly let me know what other info required to approve this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anil_Siddhu
Thank you ...
 | |
| Precious six years |
|---|
... for improving article quality in January 2018! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation
|
Thank You | |
| Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |