User talk:Samtheboy/archive0307

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Hey, welcome. Nice work tagging Category talk:Lakes of Denmark for deletion. Have you edited other wikis, or are you just really fast on the uptake? Peace, delldot talk 01:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Ha! I knew you'd been around, most new users are much more noobish ;) Yeah, recent changes patrol is really needed, as you've probably seen. Have you checked out the anti-vandalism tools? I'm a big fan of the anti-vandalism IRC channel, if you have IRC you should drop by. Peace, delldot talk 01:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Sure thing, let me know if you need anything. Peace, delldot talk 01:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Generally, recent means the same day and more specifically within a few hours. Bubba hotep 13:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Great! Those reports are better already. Thanks! Just one other thing though, could you substitute the vandal warning templates (e.g. {{subst:uw-vandalism4}} – other than that, keep up the great work. :) Bubba hotep 14:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Rvvs

Hi, and thanks for your help on fighting vandalism! I just wanted to make you aware that sometimes, more than 1 editor engages in vandalism. I often check some diffs to make sure there is nothing left in the end :) -- lucasbfr talk 14:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

please stop!

i am erasing my talk page! please dont reload —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.20.25.100 (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC).

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page! @-}----- (that's a rose, that is) --Bonadea 08:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Recent AIV reports

Thank you for reporting vandalism to WP:AIV. Unfortunately, we generally only block valdals if they have vandalized in the last 24 hours since their most recent warning. In the case of one of your reports, while they were last warned 16 hours ago, this IP is shared by many people, and the previous misbehavior was different in character. If they persist in spamming, please re-file a report. —dgiestc 08:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Your oppinions

It sound slike you have a very exciting life "Sam the boy". Patrolling with your vandal detecter eh? Try not to let your oppinions get in the way of objectivity.

Orphan Tags

I am trying to gather a consensus on whether Orphan tags are necessary on wikipedia.

Please go to the page Template talk:Orphan and fill in you opinion under the heading Please give you opinion on the Orphan tag below area of the page. Thanks Dreamweaverjack 23:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

PS I'm sorry if I caused any offence, because I didn't mean to. Dreamweaverjack 23:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi there; although this article clearly needs {{speedy}} deleting, the WP:CSD tag "invention of the mind" does not exist, although perhaps it should. the only valid speedy tags are those listed in WP:CSD, and using them produces a more rapid admin response. The article will be killed anyway.--Anthony.bradbury 23:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't criticising you - the article clearly qualifies for {{speedy}}, and you have merely highlighted the fact that the list of categories is as yet inadequate. I have in the past tried to get "invention" and "deliberate untruth" listed in WP:CSD, with no luck so far. I think the nearest tag that fits this article is {{db-nonsense}} which I have applied, because it will attract attention more quickly. But yours would be better if it existed. Have a go in Village Pump Policy.--Anthony.bradbury 23:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Archive

OK, thanks--Anthony.bradbury 23:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

vandalism

wait how did I vandalize the page? Rockinbuddy 00:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

oops sorry

Yes, it was all in good faith and I am trying to catch myself. Thanks for letting me know that I did it, I didnt see that I did it to that page. Thanks Again-and oh yah my name is same :) Rockinbuddy 00:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Why isn't is noteable anough?

Zomun's notability.

Why isn't Zomun noteable enough to have its own article?

Excuse me?

April fools day is inapropriate?? It's only like 14 days away! LazyLaces 13:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


I Dont Know!!!

Hey i dont really know how to use wikipedia so please chill out and don't delete my account

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page and warning the vandal. On another note, you would have no way of knowing, but I usually count successive vandalism edits as "one act of vandalism" for my vandal count. Just wanted to tell you before I change it... thanks again :) Leebo T/C 13:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thank you for reverting my userpage, which was vandaised while I was off-line.--Anthony.bradbury 18:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks also for reverting my user page! --Matt57 (talkcontribs) 03:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Is Mackan Administrator ?

Mackan and ShinjukuXYZ fight. [[1]] And, Mackan often rewrites the top page of the hated user to him. [2] Can he edit others' user pages? (the above comment was added by User:Necmate.

I have no idea what you are talking about. ShinjukuXYZ has been confirmed to be using sockpuppets to avoid 3RR banning. See the link provided. It should also be pointed out that Necmate is suspected to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of ShinjukXYZ. Mackan 14:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
However, the word that you gave him first is "あんたあほちゃう (You are a stupidity). " And, you were frequently rewriting top page. And, you were frequently rewriting the user page of Ikedanobuo. Could you explain the reason? [3] --Necmate 14:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I've done significant work on this article. It should now conform to guidelines enough to save it from speedy deletion. Please remove the deletion tag if you agree. Thanks. Acdixon 17:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

In response to that message just now, Xyrael is sitting right next to me now and asked me to change that typo. The moose he is a funny creature; 12:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Just to let you know, I concur - I am indeed right next to him :)Xyrael / 12:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Oops

Wow, I didn't even realize that User:ZiebaneTm was a user page...it looked really official. I was just looking around for spelling errors. My sincerest apologies...I don't know how I missed that. I have reverted my last edit. Thank you so much for pointing that out to me! Have a wonderful day.
Saber girl08 13:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I will, I promise not to let that happen again. ^_^ Thanks again! Saber girl08 13:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Talk, not User

Thanks, I didn't realise that. Darkson - BANG! 13:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Much appreciated! Will (aka Wimt) 13:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Someone doesn't like you

I was doing Newpages patrol and saw this: Samtheboy haters society. Hbdragon88 08:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)