User talk:Sananda chatterjee

Welcome

Hello Sananda chatterjee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

Kare Kare 12:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:3dimage.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:3dimage.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. :) -- Stwalkerster talk 11:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formation of delta-shaped river basin

Hi Sananda,

I just thought i should point out that there a few problems with your new article on the subject of Formation of delta-shaped river basins

1. You can not mention your name as being the editor of the page on the article itself, as it may lead to Wikipedia:Copyrights issues, and eventually it will be edited by numerous other people which would mean it's not entirely your work anyway. Everyone will know you are the author anyway, as all editing history is displayed by using the 'History' tab at the top of the page.

2. You have written the article almost as a synopsis of a single, specific journal article (i presume it has been published). While journals should be primary sources, articles do not have an abstract or the same structure as a scientific paper... just look at some of the featured articles to get an idea of typical article structure (also see Wikipedia:Manual of Style for a guide to how to set out an article). I also have linked you to a heap of introductory Wikipedia article editing and creation guides and policies at the top of this page so check them out!.

The article as it is may not stand to remain as a separate article, but you may want to add some of this information to the article on delta, drainage basin or any other similar articles. If you can expand the article, thats great also, but remember to reference it!.

If you have any more questions you can get me on my talk page or get in touch with an admin.

Cheers Kare Kare 12:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Rotenone.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Image.rotenone.jpg. The copy called Image:Image.rotenone.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hello - you uploaded a number of images with a copyright tag suggesting that you owned the copyright on the pictures, which was incorrect.

Some were taken from a private website (http://www.rocksandminerals.com), so I have deleted those.
The ones from the US Government website are OK, but the copyright tags need to be changed to reflect this (which I have done).
The remaining images give no idea as to where they come from, so I have added a tag which gives 7 days to add the copyright information, or they will be deleted.

You might want to read Wikipedia's policies on non-free image use before you upload any more images. Thanks, Black Kite 12:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrogeochemistry

Hi there, thanks for your new article. I have had the title changed to Hydrogeochemistry to better fit wikipedia's manual of style. None of the content has changed. Ged UK (talk) 14:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, just found out that the article has now been deleted for copyright violation. Please see the talk page for more info. Ged UK (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images - again

Hello - please do not continue to upload images that you do not own the copyright to, and tag them as your own. I note that you have also created an article with copyrighted material. If you continue to do so, there may be no alternative but to restrict your access to Wikipedia. Thanks, Black Kite 17:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P_prop.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P_prop.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moss culture

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Moss culture, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Clearly original research. It says so in the article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. srushe (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Culture1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Culture1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.