User talk:Sandi0000

Welcome!

Hello, Sandi0000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 16:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandi0000 (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandi0000 (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of National Geographic original programming. Indagate (talk) 19:17, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 04:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Nat Geo Wild original programming (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Nat Geo Wild programming instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Nat Geo Wild original programming and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sandi0000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Robert McClenon: this user has created a similar draft at Draft:Nat Geo Wild Shows. Disruptive editing and ownership concerns at the original article in mainspace they duplicated List of Nat Geo Wild original programming and its talk. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted half the show it's not the same thing Sandi0000 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon my edits are not the name as List Of Nat Geo Wild programming because I'm going to be editing out most of them Sandi0000 (talk) 18:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nat Geo Wild Shows (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Taking Out The Trash were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:LISTCRUFT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nat Geo Wild Shows and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nat Geo Wild Shows (September 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Utopes was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A list of shows from an external source with zero other references or content of any sort does not belong on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a database.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I linked the site where I got all the shows from how is not a source? Sandi0000 (talk) 00:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 09:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not understaning but ok Sandi0000 (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinged you there, section link if that's needed is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Removal of valid wikilinks by Sandi0000. Please stop the disruptive editing, you carried one after this message. Indagate (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing the article and draft namespaces for a period of 1 week for continued disruptive editing, despite being told to stop and discuss matters. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Thryduulf (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nat Geo Animal Shows (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

Seems to fail WP:NLIST and would require wikilinks to each listing in order to be acceptable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nat Geo Animal Shows and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing wikilinks

Per this edit removing piped links from an article because you don't need to show name twice - the names are there twice so that the bracketed "(TV series)" disambiguators aren't shown when the article is displayed.

If you don't understand how links work at Wikipedia, I'd suggest reading Help:Link#Wikilinks.

Until you understand how links work, you shouldn't remove aspects of them that seem unnecessary to you. Belbury (talk) 13:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is continuing to occur across multiple programming pages. I have tried to explain how wikilinks/ piped links work but they are refusing to listen. Cheezknight (talk) 18:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Discovery Channel original programming, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages One Man Army and One Way Out.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add any links I added dated? Sandi0000 (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

added dates I meant*

Sandi0000 (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for protection

Your request will certainly be denied as we don't protect pages if there isn't disruption like vandalism or edit warring. Toadette ^{(let's chat together)} 15:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Sandi0000 (talk) 15:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing the same edits you were temporarily blocked for, a page can't be protected to stop people with same permissions from reverting you, please discuss on the talk pages. Indagate (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I put them in Order Sandi0000 (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly re-ordering television show listings out of alphabetical order without explaining why. Your edits are disruptive and have been reverted many times, but you still can't explain what order you're putting the shows in.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Reported to admins Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sandi0000 Indagate (talk) 14:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Africa's Wild Year

Hello, Sandi0000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Africa's Wild Year, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]