User talk:SashankaChutia

May 2020

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. Your recent edit(s) to the page Dibrugarh appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, SashankaChutia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chutia people

You have a mixed record of contributions, with several of your contributions automatically flagged in your contribution history as problematic. Sticking to the positive: thank you for this edit of yours at Chutia people undoing eight unsourced revisions by another editor (who has been warned previously about unsourced article changes several times). Your revert improves the article.

However: when you undo another editor's work, it's not enough to do a stealth revert with a one-word edit summary like "Restored"; you need to either use the undo feature, if it's available to you, which will automatically provide a detailed edit summary, or you need to explain in the summary exactly what was reverted (how many revisions, by whom, restoring what version), and the reason why. Your reason might be something like, "Unsourced", or "Unexplained removal of sourced content", or "violation of policy on biographies of living persons", or whatever the problem was that needed to be fixed by undoing it, but it needs to be detailed enough to justify a revert. Also, as a new editor, you should be conservative about reverting; consider the possibility of fixing the problem, instead of reverting.

Please also take care to follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines yourself. I've left you a Welcome message above, that has some links you can follow which may help. Thanks, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Habung—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moran language

I just removed a citation to a predatory journal. Also, could you please format the references properly in your edits here: [1]. Please use the citation templates. Chaipau (talk) 17:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hi SashankaChutia! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Chutia people that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 01:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Chaipau (talk) 16:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]