User talk:Sauraved

December 2021

Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chittagonian language, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. What is worse, you have manipulated text that is cited verbatim from a source. Austronesier (talk) 16:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of cities and towns in Bangladesh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sirajganj, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sirajganj. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bengali Hindus. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sirajganj District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abdul Matin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Jeppiz (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continued disruptive editing

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style changes

Can you please stop changing the layout of articles? Infobox goes before the introduction per WP:LAYOUT, but for some unexplained reason, you keep reversing the order, putting the introduction first. I guess pointing this out in the edit summary has been missed by you, since you changed them back to the wrong format, so I'm mentioning this here in the hopes you will click on the policy. Cmr08 (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 06:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sirajganj, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jamuna and Eco Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 02:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sauraved. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]