User talk:Sayanonline15
Sayanonline15, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Sayanonline15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Swastika Dutta (Actress)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Swastika Dutta (Actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swastika Dutta. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Swastika Dutta
[edit]This article was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swastika Dutta and has been recreated so many times that the correct title is now protected to prevent further disruption. Trying to get around that is not a good thing, and is very much frowned upon. You really need to use the WP:REFUND process and see about getting it restored as a draft article that can be reviewed. You need to address all of the reasons raised in the delete discussion, and I really, REALLY hope you aren't another sock of the person who's been pushing this article. That will only hurt chances of the article being created. Think about it. Ravensfire (talk) 23:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)