User talk:Scarletredgmbh

November 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Ghmyrtle. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scarlet (color) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scarletredgmbh, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Scarletredgmbh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Scarletredgmbh/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Scarletredgmbh/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Scarletredgmbh/sandbox[edit]

Your user page, User:Scarletredgmbh/sandbox, has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be advertising which only promoted or publicized someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Scarletredgmbh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Scarletoday (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am happy to take into account the obtained reviewer feedback and hence will adjust the page content accordingly. Kindly re-open the page (release the block) so that I can keep on working on it. I am not receiving any compensation for my contributions. I understand the reason the account was blocked, and after reading though the guidelines, the point is understood and such edits will not be repeated. Contributions which I intend to make is to unbiasly add value to the existing articles as well as create new ones.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scarletredgmbh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am happy to take into account the obtained reviewer feedback and hence will adjust the page content accordingly. Kindly re-open the page (release the block) so that I can keep on working on it, ensuring that the article will have an unbiased tone

Decline reason:

No. If your only goal is to promote SCARLETRED, this is the end of the line. If instead you wish to write about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, convince us you understand WP:COI and WP:PROMO and tell us what you plan to write about instead. Yamla (talk) 10:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scarletredgmbh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do believe there is a misunderstanding of what exactly I would like to create. In no way I am to promote or do marketing for the company, however I would like to create a page for it, as many other companies have done so. I would like to kindly ask why this is not possible. CEO Harald Schnidar, PhD MBA (harald.schnidar@scarletred.com) would like to get it touch with someone responsible for the accounts and the release of the article, I would appreciate if you could point me to the direction in this regard. We are also open to talk to any related agencies for the creation of this Wikipedia page. The end of the line for us would be to gain access back to the content which was created, even if it is not released to the main Wikipedia site.

Decline reason:

If you are an employee of the company, you are a paid editor, full stop. You do not have to be specifically paid to edit. There is a misunderstanding here, but it is on your end- you have a fundamental misunderstanding as to what Wikipedia is. It is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. That is considered promotional, you do not have to be soliciting customers or selling something. Companies do not create articles about themselves here, and do not exclusively control their content. See WP:OWN. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with criteria for inclusion; mere existence does not. A Wikipedia article (not a "page") about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage, and not based on any materials put out by the company, say about it, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. Not every company merits article, even in the same field. Please read WP:COI. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about your company. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you want to be a general contributor, please tell what you will edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also need to propose an individualistic username. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]