Jump to content

User talk:Selanna13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Otto Bayer Award (April 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tom (LT) were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tom (LT) (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Selanna13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tom (LT) (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yeenosaurus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yeeno (talk) 🍁 18:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Otto Bayer Award (April 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Selanna13. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Selanna13. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Selanna13|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Blablubbs|talk 08:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selanna13 (talk) 10:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Hi Blablubbs, thank you for the heads-up. I'm not paid for the editing of the articles now, but I used to work on these topics before for other purposes and since I personally learned a lot about some of the awards, I thought it would be a good idea to create an article about awards that would enable to highlight it's recipients' names and works. Most of those recipients are honoured people in the science world and I thought it would be good to have their names on a wikipedia article. Also, it is sort of 2in1 article, that gives information about awards as well as it's recipients, so I found it efficient. I didn't include external websites into the text, but put them in the references. Though if needed, or if it'll be considered as a promotion, I can delete them too. I just wanted to incorporate all the possible resources. And actually, I wanted to to add other sources to each recipient in seperate (I'm still collecting sources) I hope it'll clarify my motives. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selanna13 (talkcontribs) 10:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your response. To be clear: You have no connection whatsoever to Bayer or any of the awards you're writing about? -- Blablubbs|talk 17:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selanna13 (talk) 14:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Hey! I don't have direct connection to the awards, I didn't receive any or I don't give away any, I just know they exist, since I'm doing an internship at Bayer. However, Bayer didn't request these articles. They also don't or cannot profit from it, since they are giving out awards. It's basically a "charity for scientists". It's just not a lot of people know about these awards, though it could be a great opportunity for scientists, so these articles would just increase the visibility of awards for scientists who want to get funded. Since Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and used by many people, I thought this would fulfill this purpose. But does it still have to be declared as a promotion in this case? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selanna13 (talkcontribs) 14:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selanna13: You can find some guidance about conflict of interest here: WP:COIEDIT. It does not need to be declared "as a promotion", but you should disclose the conflict of interest. You will find all relevant guidelines at WP:COIEDIT. Best, MarioGom (talk) 23:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blablubbs, MarioGom: I'm revisting this as I just finished undeleting Draft:Otto Bayer Award based on the user request. At the draft talk I saw the connected contributor tag. I understand that an employee or intern writing about the company's article is a COI, however the COI policy does not seem to mention about editing of articles related to the company's products, or award in this case. I would believe editing any article that furthers a company's interests would be a COI. With regards to paid editing, if the internship was paid, it would be paid editing. Comments? Jay 💬 09:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jay: My interpretation of WP:COI and WP:PAID is that it is broad enough to cover any article that furthers a company's interests. That would include, for example, any article about the company, company employees, partners, even competitors, external links and references anywhere, or any generic topic where the contribution is linked in some way. It really covers any contribution that is paid for, or that is construed as being part of a paid role (internships are considered as paid for the purposes of the disclosure policy too). MarioGom (talk) 15:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Hansen Family Award (July 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 21:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 19:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Bayer Award (July 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Selanna13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Hansen Family Award, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Hansen Family Award has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Hansen Family Award. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Hansen Family Award (January 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 13:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Bayer Award (February 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Early Excellence in Science Awards has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Early Excellence in Science Awards. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thrombosis Research Award (March 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Otto Bayer Award

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Selanna13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Otto Bayer Award, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Otto Bayer Award

[edit]

Hello, Selanna13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Otto Bayer Award".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Selanna13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Early Excellence in Science Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Selanna13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thrombosis Research Award, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Selanna13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Early Excellence in Science Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Selanna13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thrombosis Research Award".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Selanna13, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 17:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Otto Bayer Award

[edit]

Hello, Selanna13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Otto Bayer Award".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]