User talk:Sgerbic

Here is a Candy Bar for You

See: Hello. Example of the Art of Cold Reading by E on stage.[1] [2]—Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 17 June 2012‎

TUSC token b57886a212c826c663608bfecd17b794

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgerbic (talk • contribs) 15:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Sgerbic! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:37, Saturday, December 22, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Sgerbic! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:47, Thursday, March 19, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Sgerbic! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:20, Thursday, March 19, 2020 (UTC)

ANI thread about your group

FYI, there is an ANI thread at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Havana_syndrome_and_guerilla_skeptics that is relevant to you. MrOllie (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you.Sgerbic (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Sgerbic (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

GAR Skeptic's Toolbox

Skeptic's Toolbox has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 15:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NZ Skeptics

The article NZ Skeptics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability asserted by sources, almost entirely SPS or partisan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 15:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Taner Edis

The article Taner Edis has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 15:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Taner Edis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taner Edis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taner Edis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Santacruz ⁂ Please tag me! 23:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Viharo

I'm answering here because I've been "banned" by A. C. Santacruz from their User Talk Page.

The message purportedly from Rome Viharo had no real substance to it (basically: some users are evil GSoW'ers, they wrote a nasty article about me on RationalWiki, contact me on twitter to chat ...). I suspect it may not be from the real Rome Viharo but from an agitator who is just shit-stirring; there's been a bit of this of late. Alexbrn (talk) 20:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Ahhh thank you! I was looking for Rome and forgot he was Tumbledown or whatever. Strange that he is back (or someone familiar with that era) it's been a long time. interesting that he thought ACS was the person most receptive to him. Sgerbic (talk) 20:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

It could be that, but also there's someone one there (who may or may not be Viharo) who sporadically on- and off-wiki just seems to like posting messages on this topic to stoke drama, especially (on-wiki) targeting fresh users. See for example this. The aim seems just to stoke FUD among "skeptic" editors. Alexbrn (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

The "message" was totally innocent when I saw it, so goodness only knows how 1) ACS connected you with it, and 2) why they are being a huge drama queen about it escapes me. Bottom line, for those playing along, is that ACS thinks that the slightest disagreement with their editing is a gigantic personal attack, causing much pulling of hair and nessectitating (sp) drama fests and TLDR hand wringing at Dramah boards. Sheesh. Oh yes, Hi Susan, I'm still angry at you for refusing to marry me. -Roxy the dog. wooF 20:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

The comment literally mentioned Sgerbic, so I didn't connect it with her. I pinged Sgerbic because I thought she might appreciate knowing about the issue. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 20:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

It mentioned you as well, Roxy the dog, and some names I didn't recognize at all but since you have told me in other threads that you are not part of GSoW and I trust you on that I thought pinging you would be a waste of everyone's time. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 20:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

You are dissembling, ACS. -Roxy the dog. wooF 20:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)