User talk:Sherwoodspeaks

Welcome!

Hello, Sherwoodspeaks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sherwoodspeaks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sherwoodspeaks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of state legislature Speakers

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Sherwoodspeaks, thanks for creating List of state legislature Speakers!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources to this article. If by 'External links' you mean sources rather than 'suggestions for further reading' then please change the heading.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add WP:PRIMARY sources to articles

Do not add WP:PRIMARY sources to articles on politicians. Wikipedia does not host campaign websites for candidates, and I hope you can see why it's problematic to include content that's only sourced candidates' own websites. If a politician has done something that's notable and WP:DUE, it should be covered by reliable secondary sources (such as newspapers). Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Thanks! --Sherwoodspeaks (talk) 20:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that some of the VoteSmart links that you're adding don't count as secondary RS and are in some cases just campaign releases. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jytdog (talk) 16:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell, man? I'm working on getting the word out about what Pennsylvania politicians running for office - what their views are on issues. That's encyclopedic and quality sources are being cited. So what the hell is this warning about? --Sherwoodspeaks (talk) 16:28, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a notice of discretionary sanctions. You will choose to be mindful of them, or not. You have in any case been notified of them, which is an essential step in their implementation. If, after reading the links in the notice you don't understand something, please do ask specific questions. Jytdog (talk) 16:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Sherwoodspeaks (talk) 16:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sherwoodspeaks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]