User talk:Sicb2320

Welcome!

Hello, Sicb2320, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Adakiko (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm MrOllie. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MrOllie (talk) 14:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't over-link

I undid your edits to Electronic paper as you over-linked and used URL-links to Wikipedia articles. Please don't over-link. See wp:OVERLINK for policy and advice. See wp:linking for how to link. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 06:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive reference removals

On Genetically modified crops and a number of other articles, you have removed full citations to WP:RS sources with just the text 'dead link'. Dead external links are not a justification for removing a source. You can tag refs with {{deadlink}} at the end of the ref if you choose, but don't remove author info, paper titles, etc. These sources all exist, even if the link is dead, and there is no requirement for wikipedia article references to be available online.Dialectric (talk) 13:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Hanafi school, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ali Al-Kourani, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained to you, in the section above, that you should NOT delete references just because they are dead, but you are still doing that. Please STOP. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Abdolmohammad Ayati. -, Arjayay (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Friedrich Nietzsche, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
It has repeatedly been explained to you, above, that you should NOT delete references just because they are dead, but you are still doing that. Please STOP. - Arjayay (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain areas of Wikipedia for your disruptive editing in article space.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.