User talk:Sikh khalsa

Welcome

Hi Sikh khalsa! welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

Here are some links that you might find useful:   Wikipedia:How to edit a page   Tutorial   Sandbox, the place where you can experiment   Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.   Wikipedia:Five pillars   Wikipedia:Manual of Style

You can contribute in many ways   write an article   fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Improve illustrations and upload new images   perform maintenance tasks   Become member of a project that interests you

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. You can also type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! utcursch | talk 12:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

hi

Dear Sikh Khalsa

Hi how are you..can we discuss Singh Article..my name is harrybabbar.

Harrybabbar (talk) 05:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello Sikh Khalsa!

Some great contributions from you and I have noted you have used www.sikhs.org as a site of refrence. In my humble opinion www.sikhs.or is one of the best sites around. Keep the good work up.--Sikh-history (talk) 14:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

hi

Please check Deh Siva Var Mohe. Some disruptive edits and vand. You can go through history and you will know. Also see talk. please help resolve, protect against vand.ThanksAjjay (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

He is making disruptive edits to sikh related articles.

• Guru Nanak Dev
• Dasam Granth
• Guru Gobind Singh
• Khalsa etc.

In deh siva he is claiming siva is shiv and refuses to see reason and accuses me of being fundamentalist. actually i had an edit war with him in Bhindranwale and he started editing Sikh articles to harrass me.He is anonymous ip address , you will find him in history of Deh Siva Var Mohe. Keep a watch on sikhism articles for vand. ThanksAjjay (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

hi again

When you add some information to an article , try and add references (esp. for exceptional claims). Sikh related topics are prone to vandalism, as are host of others. Adding ref. helps guard against vandalism .See[1].Ajjay (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Guru Granth Sahib

Check the para, in intro, which starts with, "considered to be a revolutionary act, guru granth sahib was nominated as guru of sikhs by Guru gobind singh....The line considered to be a revolutionary act was added by me. do you think it is appropriate or too vague. do the needful, should it be removed or let it remain.Ajjay (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok thanks. please also check [2]. If you could add some inputs, it would be nice. Ajjay (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes i know that. But i was only explaning to him quickly. He must have read the reason specified by sikh history, but he was not ready to let go of his notions.Ajjay (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi friend

Hi friend, I removed "considered to be a revolutionary act" from the Guru Granth Sahib as there seems to be a lot of trouble makers asking for a cite. Now everyone in the 25 million Sikh community knows it was "a revolutionary act", you and me know it was a revolutionary act. However, there are a lot of non-sikhs or militant Atheists on this site who don't believe in anything or a reason why the Universe exists and are pushing their Atheists views so I removed it to prevent giving these trouble makers more ammunition. But, please dig a cite up for it, I am sure Khushwant Singh has written in one of his books exactly that statement. Moreover, there is a user pushing the view that the Guru Granth Sahib has to have no things in it that other scriptures don't have in their articles e.g. bible or koran. This is a false conclusion - every article is unique and should be written uniquely for that article. More specifically I am talking about the removal by a user on the section about Non sikh comments e.g nobel prize winner about the Guru Granth sahib just because there is not one in the others articles on scriptures. This is a false conclusion - every article is unique and should be written uniquely for that article.--Sikh khalsa (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I have a ref. for the phrase "revolutionary act". i didn't add the ref., cause i thought that no prob. would be there. Now i can't find it, but i will locate the ref. soon and add it back. No worry. Also, you know a lot of people visit wiki, all types. As Sggs says, only those realize the lord, whom he wishes to. We should not be angry on anybody. Also the person who removed it , did not act in bad faith. Also, i am not sure about the comments thing, I myself removed them once.(lots of negative comments exist too, example by TRUMPP) I agree that every article is unique, and shold be written as such. You can sort the issue , the user who removed the comments is Relata refero (talk. Basically nice guy. You can find discusion btw him and me in article talk page on an issue. Also i think we should form an effort to improve upon the article, it is an important article, very vital. Ajjay (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Message

I am currently sorting Sikh article, but don't worry i will try and improve the article as much as i can. i am currently free right now (due to a pending life problem), but my holiday is going to be over soon. After that i don't think that i would be able to contribute much. You know the major reason is that sikhs or punjabi people don't bother much about their history, (look at articles on other topics). But we will improve this article surely.Ajjay (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Hi friend

Here, you said: "there seems to be a lot of trouble makers asking for a cite". Asking for a citation for something is NOT "trouble making". You also said, "there are a lot of non-sikhs or militant Atheists on this site who don't believe in anything or a reason why the Universe exists and are pushing their Atheists views..." Please see WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. The beliefs of a Wikipedian are irrelevant when editing an article and it not good form to make such accusations without proof. On a side note, to say that atheists "don't believe in anything" is incorrect. Please see Atheism. --Geniac (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Any suggestions [3]. How do you think it is coming up?Shalimer (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

How is the article now? Any suggestions Ajjay

Extremely Urgent - IHRO

Please give your vote at Wikipedia:RSN#ihro.in if you beleive that Human Rights Watchdog is a unbiased organization.

Please remember that huge number of crimes committed by Indian security forces in Punjab will go un-referenced on wikipedia if www.ihro.in is declared POV site. Reason this is among extremely few unbiased sources available online. Eventhough some of the north-Indian newspapers always published govt crimes in Punjab, but unfortunately they do not have this old data archived. For example, The Tribune (a 125 year old newspaper group), one of north-Indian newspapers does not have any online editions prior to year 2001 and Ajit, a regional newspaper of India etc did not have any online editions untill very recently. Also, India’s National magazine, Frontline does not have archive records prior to 1997.

Please read "Amnesty International", "Amnesty International, "Human Rights watch" where it says that "Thousands of mothers await their sons even though some may know that that the oppressor has not spared their sons’ lives on this earth. A mother’s heart is such that even if she sees her son’s dead body, she does not accept that her son has left her. And those mothers who have not even seen their children’s dead bodies, they were asking us: at least find out, is our son alive or not?" and "ENSAAF". As per HRW, Indian security forces arbitrarily detained, tortured, executed, and “disappeared” tens of thousands of Sikhs in counterinsurgency operations. Please remember, Amnesty International was not allowed to enter Punjab during these troubled times, hence Amnesty can not provide records of most of the crimes committed by Indian security forces as an India based Organization IHRO.

So please vote at Wikipedia:RSN#ihro.in ASAP .Singh6 (talk) 07:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sikh Empire. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sikh-History 10:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dr Narinder Singh Kapany.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dr Narinder Singh Kapany.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)