User talk:Simon Omnes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Simon Omnes! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ueutyi (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Omnes (October 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fuortu was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fuortu (talk) 16:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Simon Omnes, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fuortu (talk) 16:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Boulton (actor) has been accepted[edit]

Nicholas Boulton (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 00:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicholas Boulton (actor) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicholas Boulton (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Boulton (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  10:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


(message left here rather than deletion page)

Simon Omnes, the criteria for inclusion of any subject is significant, in depth, coverage in sources that are reliable and clearly independent of the subject (in the case of an actor, that is going to include reviews in which s/he is mentioned by name). Also WP:notability isn't 'inherited' by being connected to 'notable' projects, so even if someone has worked at the RSC, BBC etc for eons, it counts for nothing here if it isn't recorded in WP:RS, and even then we don't want acres of text about how good a person was. I have to agree with the proposer, the article is ludicrously 'over-written' and actually does a disservice to the subject by seeming to make fairly little seem 10 times more important than it really was. I am not going to vote either way at present, but as far as I could see, the vast preponderance of refs would not meet WP standards and much text and 'reffing', seems to be trying to establish 'inherited notability'. The article might stand a better chance of survival if it were a tenth of present length and better reffed. 'Simon' is under no obligation to reply to you, and the article has to earn the right to exist, not Simon or us justify its deletion, so don't get upset at editor's comments here, nor if it is deleted. Pincrete (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Simon Omnes. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/Simon Omnes".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]