User talk:Skhantoosh

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Qbroka/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Qbroka/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mean as custard (talk) 08:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Deb (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skhantoosh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im new in wikipedia and i have been blocked please can i be assisted to this

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skhantoosh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason of block and i have also went through the rules of using wikipedia

Decline reason:

You have not selected a new username as instructed. It is also not enough to simply state that you understand, you need to demonstrate that you understand by explaining what you did wrong in your own words, what steps you will take to not do it again, and tell us what you intend to edit about instead as you will not be allowed to edit about Qbroka. Until you do those things, you cannot be unblocked. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 08:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skhantoosh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

its not about promoting my company i want to add a profile here in wikipedia and username can be skhantoosh.

Decline reason:

Per below. If you continue to be ignorant of the purpose of this website, or fail to write your unblock appeals in correctly punctuated and grammatical correct English (as English language proficiency is required here) your ability to make further appeals may be withdrawn. MER-C 14:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note that you cannot remove declined unblock requests while you are blocked. As I have already reviewed this block, another administrator will review your new request, but you still have not suggested a new username as instructed in your block notice, and you will not be unblocked if you only want to promote your company. Se WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 09:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot remove declined unblock requests while you are blocked. If you do so again, your ability to edit this page will be removed. Your use of the phrase "adding a profile" suggests to me that you have a common misunderstanding as to what Wikipedia is. "Adding a profile" is considered promotional on Wikipedia. This is because Wikipedia is not social media, but an encyclopedia. As an encyclopedia, we do not have "profiles" but articles about subjects shown to be notable with independent reliable sources. We are not interested in what a company wants to say about itself. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID; the latter is mandatory for paid company representatives. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So it is properly visible, you will need to format your username change request as described in your block notice. 331dot (talk) 10:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello anyone reviewing this, please ive been spending years understanding the concept of editing in wikipedia. Due to my ignorance in the beginning and not following the rules of wikipedia i hereby say sorry for copy and pasting before. please allow me some other chances for my apologize. thank you.

latest unblock

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Skhantoosh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

skhantoosh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I don't know which reason you guys need but i've said it i had copied the other page content and i agree its an offence now can i be unblocked so i can repent from what i did

Decline reason:

Let's try this. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

The proposed new username is acceptable. However, the other elements of the block still need to be addressed. To be unblocked:

you must confirm that this account is used by one individual only
you must agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to Qbroka, and no links there to either. (requested edits will still be permitted)
you must agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you must indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets.

So we know understanding is mutual, please state your understanding/response to each item in your own words.

I'm sorry that this message could not be more favourable.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Qbroka to Skhantoosh

It is done.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion, as Swaleh Khalid, in January, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Skhantoosh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Swaleh Khalid (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

hello anyone reviewing this, please ive been spending years understanding the concept of editing in wikipedia. Due to my ignorance in the beginning and not following the rules of wikipedia i hereby say sorry for copy and pasting before. please allow me some other chances for my apologize. thank you.

Decline reason:

Due to your block evasion, I have reblocked this account. You now need to address your violations of WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, WP:SPAM, and now, WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]