User talk:Sliders64

Welcome

Hello, Sliders64, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Tuanminh01 (talk) 14:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Speedy deletion nomination of 2022 in Road to Indy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2022 in Road to Indy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ––FormalDude talk 10:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Road to Indy seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Road to Indy seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding F3 cat to 2022 Euroformula Open Championship

This is now the fourth time I've had to revert your edits to 2022 Euroformula Open Championship. I've explained it in the edit summaries of all my reverts: EFO stopped being a Formula Three championship with the chassis change in 2020. And you still keep adding the [[Category:2022 in Formula Three]] template day after day after day. What are you here for precisely? Build the encyclopedia or damage it? Please stop with this now or next time you will be reported. MSport1005 (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this champioship has always been in formula three championship. they use the same chassis as the super formula lights which is in formula three category. Last year euroformula open was in the category formula three. this championship holds these roots of the historic formula 3. so yes it must be part of the formula 3 category.In this case also delete the Australian formula 3 championship and the super formula lights Sliders64 (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about "it must be". It simply isn't. The Championship and Formula Scout clearly state it. The Euroformula Open Championship article also picks up on this: "In 2020, the championship ceased to be a F3-championship [...]". There is no debate here, and what you're doing by constantly adding the category is purely vandalism. MSport1005 (talk) 22:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'd recommend you have a look at the championship's technical regulations if you still don't believe me. The only thing about the car that resembles F3 is the look with the characteristic roll hoop and side intake, as it's based on the old European F3 Dallaras. But that's it. Other than that, the car is actually built to F1's safety regulations, downforce levels are even higher than the current F3, aerodynamic efficiency is higher than F2 (!!!) and close to Super Formula. Technically speaking only the power-to-weight ratio puts it at F3 level of performance. So no, to all your comments: no, Euroformula is NOT a Formula Three series anymore. And neither is Super Formula Lights. Now please stop reverting. MSport1005 (talk) 22:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai que faire de vos menaces et de vos commentaires.Je vois que vous n'avez pas supprimé la formula super lights! Pourquoi? La FIA F3 et la formula régionale n'ont rien en commun et se retrouve dans même catégorie!!! de même que la formule 3 australienne. C'est une catégorie type F3 donc l'Euroformula à toute sa place dans la catégorie et je vais la réintégrer que cela vous plaise ou non. Sliders64 (talk) 08:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with MSport1005 on this one, there are clear sources saying Euroformula Open is no longer an F3 championship. Also, not speaking English on the English Wikipedia does not make your argument any stronger. H4MCHTR (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English is not the universal language! learn French or another language. it will enrich your culture! Sliders64 (talk) 21:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Honni soit qui mal y pense!" Isn't this motto in French that of the United Kingdom? CQFD Sliders64 (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MSport1005: you are an idiot! and i remain polite Sliders64 (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Euroformula Open Championship. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Ce n'est ni du vandalisme,et c'est tout à fait constructif. La super formula lights est dans cette catégorie. Elle utilise le même châssis et le même moteur. Donc je ne vois pas pourquoi l'Euroformula n'aurait pas sa place dans cette catégorie. Donc je vais la réintégrer dès maintenant. Sliders64 (talk) 12:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read my comments above. The Dallara 320 was built to several specs above F3. Euroformula Open and Super Formula Lights, as series that use that car since 2020, stopped being Formula 3 series in 2020. Hence, your edits are not only problematic, but also unconstructive because they are wrong. Also, in case you did not notice, you are in the ENGLISH Wikipedia. MSport1005 (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C'est vous qui m'interpelez en m'envoyant des messages et donc je fais ce que je veux et si je veux vous répondre en Français je vous répondrais en Français. Je n'ai que faire de vos commentaires. Ma position est justifié et vos explications ne sont que des élucubrations sans interêt. Sliders64 (talk) 15:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Super Formula Lights, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Euroformula Open Championship, you may be blocked from editing. MSport1005 (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Super Formula Lights, you may be blocked from editing. Sliders64 (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. MSport1005 (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are ridiculous!!!! you want that page be blocked again??? Sliders64 (talk) 08:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2022 Super Formula Lights shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 18:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to discuss but my interlocutor is limited. He doesn't want to know anything while my changes are justified. Instead, talk to him to make him listen to reason. Cordially Sliders64 (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Give us a source that supports your claim, we have both given multiple sources. H4MCHTR (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have already explained to you that the formula 3 category in wikipedia was a category that grouped together all the F3 type formulas (Austrlalian F3, Formula regional, FIA F3, DREXLER cup, Euroformula, Superformula lights, etc.). Your explanations are inconsistent because you leave the FIA F3 and the regional formula in the same category when they have nothing in common, even less with the Australian Formula 3. So the formula 3 category corresponds to a type of formula and not to the rules of the regional formula. Look at the previous seasons 2021, 2020... in the formula three category and you will have your answer. In this case, create a regional formula category. Sliders64 (talk) 18:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. H4MCHTR (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm right, you're wrong. That' all Sliders64 (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But how can you just ignore all the sources presented to you saying otherwise. You also may read this article: https://formulascout.com/fia-brings-end-to-f3-as-a-category-brdc-british-f3-rebrands-to-gb3/82127

The FIA ended the F3 category, only FIA F3 may use this name from now on, this should be a clear indication you're in the wrong. Thank you. H4MCHTR (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's a formula 3 type category, not only formula regional, so the euroformula and the superformula lights have all that place in the category. In this case create a category formula regional. Like I said before, I'm right you're wrong... Sliders64 (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's as pointless as saying Super Formula is a "Formula 2 series" or IndyCar is a "Formula 1 series"... There is something called F3 specification and EFO and SFL simply don't follow that anymore. All the sources User:H4MCHTR and I have presented prove this — you have provided none. MSport1005 (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you are stubborn, there is no point in arguing with you. Sliders64 (talk) 21:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (2022 Euroformula Open Championship and 2022 Super Formula Lights) for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 19:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for severe communication issues; disruptive editing against community concerns: Responding to other users' concerns in French after being asked to use English, for the sole purpose of making a point; edit warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked me for why ? I speak english 2 or 3 Times and After i speak only in english. So i wait for your explanations ? Sliders64 (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I speak french 2 or 3 Times i want to say Sliders64 (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: no answer to my question? Sliders64 (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: corection! i speak only one time in french and after that i speak in english and you blocked me for that? Sliders64 (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not online 24/7.

Regarding communication issues, I only had to open the revision history of this talk page and click "prev" next to your username; this leads to interesting diffs such as these: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] I call that "severe communication issues" and "responding to other users' concerns in French after being asked to use English, for the sole purpose of making a point". If you believe that's not an accurate description, feel free to request an independent review using the instructions above.
Regarding edit warring, well, you haven't addressed that yet.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! [12] appeared while I was typing. If you still need editing access to this talk page, stop attacking others. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so because I spoke in French once or twice you blocked me. I do not have the right to modify the pages after having given explanations but MSport1005 can do it. I must not attack MSport1005 but he has all the freedom to do so, in particular by accusing me of vandalism.I'm blocked but not him!All this would it not be biased? Sliders64 (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{re|ToBeFree}}I am copying and pasting the explanations I gave concerning the reasons for these changes. "I have already explained to you that the formula 3 category in wikipedia was a category that grouped together all the F3 type formulas (Austrlalian F3, Formula regional, FIA F3, DREXLER cup, Euroformula, Superformula lights, etc.). Your explanations are inconsistent because you leave the FIA F3 and the regional formula in the same category when they have nothing in common, even less with the Australian Formula 3. So the formula 3 category corresponds to a type of formula and not to the rules of the regional formula. Look at the previous seasons 2021, 2020... in the formula three category and you will have your answer. In this case, create a regional formula category." Sliders64 (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: i am copying and pasting the explanations I gave concerning the reasons for these changes. "I have already explained to you that the formula 3 category in wikipedia was a category that grouped together all the F3 type formulas (Austrlalian F3, Formula regional, FIA F3, DREXLER cup, Euroformula, Superformula lights, etc.). Your explanations are inconsistent because you leave the FIA F3 and the regional formula in the same category when they have nothing in common, even less with the Australian Formula 3. So the formula 3 category corresponds to a type of formula and not to the rules of the regional formula. Look at the previous seasons 2021, 2020... in the formula three category and you will have your answer. In this case, create a regional formula category." Sliders64 (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many new users mix up Wikipedias and initially contribute in a different language than English. Some of them are unable to read English text at all, and we attempt to welcome and guide them with messages in their preferred language(s) using templates such as {{welcomeen-fr}}. Your English, on the contrary, is well-understandable, and you did choose to edit the English Wikipedia and communicate with its other editors. You chose to repeatedly revert others' contributions, such as at 2022 Super Formula Lights, to the point of full protection and beyond. The last thing you did before the block was conducting a series of reverts to your preferred revision of multiple pages, in response to objections about your edits. When this happens in combination with (or at least shortly after) a refusal to communicate in English despite clearly being able to, you end up being blocked. Biased? It would have been strangely biased against the rest of the community not to prevent you from annoying them further. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: you evade all the questions that I ask you in your message like why I am blocked and why Msport1005 is not? why does he have the right to modify my changes and not me? I copied and pasted my arguments but at no time do you allude to them. your username is ToBeFree. To be free for what? to discriminate against people who don't think like you? A moderator must be impartial. Unfortunately you are not. I have been contributing for several years to improving and updating single-seater information on existing pages. And result? you block me without any concideration for my arguments and the contributions that I could bring in the past. It is not fair. Sliders64 (talk) 16:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tu quoque defenses are logical fallacies; WP:NOTTHEM is the Wikipedia equivalent of this explanation. Again, you're welcome to let someone else evaluate whether the block was justified.

There are generally two types of unblock requests: Those which argue that the initial block was unjustified, and those which argue that it is no longer needed. Both is possible, and I can't judge in this case here. I may be completely wrong, and you're free to request this to be checked. However, what I can report from observation of other users' unblock requests about other administrators' blocks, in over 90% of the cases, the initial block was very justified and those arguing against the initial justification of the block are almost always incorrect. Those who understand the reason for their block and are willing to change their behavior to match the community's expectations practically only need to convince the reviewing administrator of this understanding and are unblocked without much bureaucracy.

The unblock template can be used for both types of unblock requests, and there is no time limit for doing so. If I may make a suggestion, think about the two options for a while, perhaps a week, and create an unblock request with a concise, clear description of what has happened and why the block can be removed. I'm fine with any administrator reviewing the request without asking me before unblocking. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you evade my questions by referring me to links. you infantilized me with your "it's not me it's him". You are over the limit by referring me to a link that compares my attitude in the example of this link to the defense of Klaus Barbie during the Nuremberg trial! For your information, my maternal grandfather was locked up in a Nazi concentration camp during the Second World War. and it's me who is blocked for so-called wikipedia vandalism! wow! With the questions I asked you I'm just trying to understand why the rules aren't the same for everyone and for the moment I don't have a clear answer, except for a moral lesson by referring me to off-topic links. I will make a request for unblock and " faire ammende honorable" ( i don't know the translation in english for this expression) for some of my actions but not for others or I am in my right Sliders64 (talk) 15:43, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was not my intention; see tu quoque for the main article about the logical fallacy unrelated to any legal context. What I was trying to say is that the block is about your behavior, not others', and an unblock discussion is about your behavior, not others'. Two wrongs don't make a right is another way of saying this. I'm not evading your questions by referring you to links, I'm providing links to show that this is not solely my opinion but actually reflects, for example, the advice in the guide for requesting unblocks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

demande de déblocage

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sliders64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Écrivez en anglais, s'il vous plaît ... c'est un des raisons pour votre bloque. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bonjour.Merci de bien vouloir débloquer mon compte. Lors d'une modification de page que j'ai effectué, un utilisateur de wikpédia à remodifié mon intervention. il s'en est suivi une modification incessante entre cet utilisateur et moi même et des échanges musclés dont je regrette le contenu venant de ma part. J’ aussi écris en français dans la discussion de cette page en anglais. On m’ a bloqué pour mes propos qui n'ont jamais été injurieux mais je reconnais assez désobligeant. On m'a aussi bloqué pour avoir écris en français ce que j'ai corrigé tout de suite pour la suite de la discussion et pourtant on me reproche d'avoir continuer à écrire en français ce qui n'était plus le cas. En revanche je maintient avoir été dans mon bon droit quand à la modification que j'avais apporté. J'ai contribué plusieurs fois dans la catégorie sport automobile à faire évoluer les pages wikipédia depuis des années. Je veux juste apporter ma contribution à mon niveau pour enrichir les pages concernant dans mon domaine de compétence. je regrette à nouveau mes échanges pas très constructif dans mes discussions. Merci d'avance de bien vouloir me permettre de participer de façon intelligente à l'enrichissement de wikipédia. Cordialement Sliders64 (talk) 08:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unlock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sliders64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Your continued inability to correctly write an unblock request does nothing to convince me you have overcome the WP:CIR issues. Try again. You'll probably only get one more chance, though, so make it count. Yamla (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello. Thank you for unblocking my account. During a page modification that I made, a wikipedia user modified my intervention. there followed an incessant modification between this user and myself and strong exchanges of which I regret the content coming from me. I also write in French in the discussion of this page in English. I was blocked for my remarks which were never offensive but I recognize quite derogatory. I was also blocked for having written in French which I corrected immediately for the rest of the discussion and yet I am reproached for having continued to write in French which was no longer the case. On the other hand I maintain to have been in my right when with the modification which I had brought. I have contributed several times in the motorsport category to make the wikipedia pages evolve for years. I just want to make my contribution at my level to enrich the pages concerning in my area of expertise. I again regret my not very constructive exchanges in my discussions. Thank you in advance for allowing me to participate intelligently in the enrichment of Wikipedia. Cordially PS: I made my unlocking request first in French because I thought I was on the French version of Wikipedia Sliders64 (talk) 16:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are most certainly right not to unblock me but I would like to understand what does not correspond to my unblocking request? Thanks in advance. Sliders64 (talk) 17:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sliders64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Please defer to UTRS for further consideration. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I allow myself to make you a request again to unblock my account. I took the time to reflect on my blocking and my previous unblocking request. Following the modification of a page concerning motorsport, this one was canceled by another user. There followed an incessant modification between this user and myself. I made remarks and reflections to him that were incorrect and inappropriate. I actually also discussed in French when I should have exclusively written in English. First of all, I should have not constantly modified the page concerned and discussed in a much more constructive way with this user. As I said in my previous request i just want to make my contribution at my level to enrich the pages concerning in my area of expertise. Thank you in advance for allowing me to participate intelligently in enrichment o wikipedia. Cordially Sliders64 (talk) 16:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]