User talk:Sobemnwoko

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sobemnwoko/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sobemnwoko, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sobemnwoko/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 10:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evidence-based organizations (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evidence-based organizations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Evidence-based organizations concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Evidence-based organizations, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Evidence-based organizations

Hello, Sobemnwoko. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Evidence-based organizations".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Evidence-based organizations

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Evidence-based organizations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ebpsociety.org/2016-q1/191-becoming-an-evidence-based-organization-five-key-components-to-consider. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

==The content is one I published on my website, ebpsociety.org. I directed the author to write the material as part of a book my company Joyfields Institute published also. Nonetheless, I will review [Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]. You can delete material if you like. I have to rewrite it anyways with the proper credits, etc. Sobemnwoko (talk) 17:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the page. If you are the copyright holder and wish to donate the material to Wikipedia under license, please follow the instructions at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. The draft can be restored if and when permission is confirmed. 13:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello again

If you haven´t read Wikipedia:Your first article it might be a good idea to do so. I know nothing about Evidence-based organizations, but if the article you write appears to promote your company or it´s services (WP:COI), it will be almost impossible to have it accepted on WP. Good luck! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Grabergs - I have no desire nor inclination to promote my company through WP. I was surprised at absence of material on the subject matter is what prompted me to contribute. I will try again later. Thanks again. Sobemnwoko (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it, and again, good luck! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]