User talk:Solotaig
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Split of Joshua French and Tjostolv Moland reverted
[edit]Greetings! I've reverted your split of the Joshua French and Tjostolv Moland article. Neither of the subjects appear to be individually notable; I think we need to discuss and gain consensus of whether the article warrants splitting.
Even if the article were to be split, we cannot delete the page history of Joshua French and Tjostolv Moland. That shows the contributors who got the text into its current condition. The GFDL license that Wikipedia operates under requires attribution; the page history accomplishes that attribution. Removing the page history would effectively be removing the attribution and violating the license terms. —C.Fred (talk) 15:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have added text to the article about Joshua French, so therefore it is not a split.
- If the page nominated for deletion is to be deleted, then we have routines for how to handle the attributions. It's not like the first time wikipedia end up doing that.--Solotaig (talk) 15:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Commercial offshore diving
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Commercial offshore diving. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Professional diving. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Professional diving - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:58, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Offshore divers v. Norway 2008 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability of this legal case not sufficiently established. One news article, and a judge's verdict, are not sufficient signs of notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Category:Trials by justiciary of foreign nation
[edit]Category:Trials by justiciary of foreign nation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Category:Trials by location
[edit]Category:Trials by location, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Category:Trials in Great Britain has been nominated for renaming
[edit]Category:Trials in Great Britain has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 22:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)