User talk:Spectrallights

Welcome!

Hello, Spectrallights, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Legends of the Fall, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. It's not clear to me on what basis you categorized this as a 'father and son' film, especially as I don't see any real discussion of that dynamic in the article. DonIago (talk) 16:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DonIago, the basis of my categorization of Legends of the Fall as a ‘father and son’ film is the plot description in the opening section which states “film is about three brothers and their father,” the film poster which displays father and son characters, and the plot summary which goes on to detail the relationships between the three sons and their father. You are free to remove categories as you wish if they do not meet your standards for what qualifies as a ‘father and son’ film. Spectrallights (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you're describing...applying a category based on the plot description and poster rather than any sources...is the definition of original research. Please tell me that the categories you've been adding to other film articles have been based on more than the plot descriptions and promo materials. DonIago (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that viewing the film counts as original research. And while many films can fit several categories—this film addresses individual freedom vs governmental authority, for example—Legends of the Fall is very much the story of a father's relationships with his three distinctly different sons. I defy anyone with a brain who has viewed this film to argue otherwise. And I did original research: I viewed the film. Kindly Copyeditor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kindly Copyeditor (talk • contribs) 19:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Spectrallights! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Claims of “original research”, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

I've reverted the ones you brought to my attention, since they were obviously not properly supported by the sources. If it continues, however, please bring it to WP:ANI; as I've already been involved in reverting, I wouldn't be the right person to impose an editblock if it comes to that. Bearcat (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for your input. Spectrallights (talk) 00:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar

The article To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar for comments about the article, and Talk:To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of SNL

Thank you for your work on the history of SNL articles, adding refs and consistency and whatnot earlier this year. I've created a new article with another editor at Draft:History of Saturday Night Live that is fully sourced and attempts to be a comprehensive look across the history, and I've nominated the old articles for deletion. I've used portions/sources (that you found) from some of the old articles for the new one in some sections. I just wanted to invite you to improve the draft article if you're interested and try and add anything you think could be missing or not covered; even if it was left out intentionally we could use the input of more editors. We did this because the five-year increments between articles were completely arbitrary and pointless, and the articles were basically just duplicates of the dedicated season articles; we feel the new draft article does a much better job at providing a comprehensive historical look across the show's history. StewdioMACK (talk) 19:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for letting me know! I'll contribute to the draft if I can think of anything not covered.

Spectrallights (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! We'll be moving it to main space and out of draft space soon, and replacing the history section on the main Saturday Night Live article with a condensed version of this new article (which I'm working on at my sandbox). You may be able to help improve recent eras in particular on the new article; they're not as tightly written right now as the older ones. :) StewdioMACK (talk) 17:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]