User talk:Sstevenson12221

Hay

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blac Chyna has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blac Chyna was changed by Sstevenson12221 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952349 on 2015-02-17T00:43:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blac Chyna with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tyga, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tyga was changed by Sstevenson12221 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936143 on 2015-02-17T01:15:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Bobherry talk 01:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sstevenson12221, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Bobherry talk 01:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]