User talk:Stage Historian

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Stage Historian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Martinevans123 (talk) 16:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stage Historian, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Stage Historian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Stage Golfing Society[edit]

Hi Stage Historian. I see that you've added details about membership of the "Stage Golfing Society" to a number of articles about actors. I wonder do you have any sources at all for these claims? If so, please add, otherwise your additions, although not really contentious, are likely to be removed. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are a new user. I wonder are you aware of how to answer questions on your Talk Page? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've now reverted all your remaining additions. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You could have avoided all of this by simply adding a reliable source for each of your additions. You might want to read up on what that means. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:42, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jed Mercurio seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to David Morrissey. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Alistair Petrie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Robert Pugh. –Qpalzmmzlapq T C 17:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for continuously adding unsourced information. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stage Historian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am the captain of the stage golfing society and the pages I added to are pages of friends of mine whoa are members of the society and indeed know that I am adding to their pages. So an accusation of Oshwah are unfounded and uninformed.Stage Historian (talk) 13:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't addressed the reason for your block, which is that you are adding unsourced or original content to a number of articles. Yamla (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.