User talk:Starracer64

Starracer64, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Starracer64! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Starracer64, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the Reliable Source guidelines

Hi, recently you have been replacing data with a statement that you are including a reliable source. However, the source that you are using is not what Wikipedia defines as a reliable source - one with a reputation for fact checking and editorial oversight and accuracy in the area of reporting. India box office claims are so subject to corruption and misreporting that only a handful of sites are accepted as meeting Wikipedia's criteria. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in agreement with TRPOD's comment above. The site you submitted in these edits [1][2] looks like a hastily assembled blog, not a reputable news outlet. There is no obvious editorial standard—I don't even see a list of staff. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Enthiran, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Prhartcom (talk) 14:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pavanjandhyala. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Temper (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aagadu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Attarintiki Daredi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Papanasam (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [3] You have been given ample opportunities to read about what types of sources Wikipedia finds suitable for inclusion. Please stop submitting improper sources like this blog. You have been advised specifically to avoid using indianmoviestats.com as a reference. If you continue to add problematic sources, you may find your editing privileges revoked. References must come from reliable published sources that have a clear editorial standard and that are presumed to engage in fact checking. The source you keep adding has none of that going on. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest-grossing Indian films

As stated at the top of List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films#Global_gross_figures and at Baahubali: The Beginning and discussed on the talk page at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films repeatedly, sources state that it is both a Tamil and a Telugu film so it is listed on both lists. If you want to argue it further, go on the talk page and argue it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:22, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Pavanjandhyala. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Srimanthudu because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Diffs: [4][5][6][7] As previously noted, faceless blogs are not presumed to be reliable sources because anybody with an internet connection can create a blog and claim to be an expert on any given subject. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking have to say. You've had ample opportunities to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. If you submit a problematic reference again, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]