User talk:Stewmuhn

This is Stewmuhn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khania Dighi Mosque (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khania Dighi Mosque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stewmuhn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biryani

Hi - I'm Girth Summit, and administrator here. I reverted your edit at Biryani because, as I said in my edit summary, the source does not support the content you added. Now, you know that your edit is contested - if you want to reinstate it, you are expected to make the case for it on the article's talk page. You are not entitled to simply reinstate it over other people's objections. This is covered at WP:EW and at WP:BRD. Please read them, and do not reinstate the edit without gaining consensus on the article's talk page. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Girth, first off I’d like to apologize. I’m new to wiki and am not accustomed with the talk page yet. Getting back to the topic, if you see the third para of the first citation I gave then you will see that it talks about the origin of Kacchi biriyani in Bengal and the other two citations I gave are in Bengali which talk about the origin of kacchi from Dhaka. Stewmuhn (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've looked at those sources, and I'm afraid I remain convinced that they do not support the content you have added.

The first source, Slurrp, says this: Tracing the origins of kachchi biryani is a complex task, as there are various theories and historical accounts associated with its origin. It is widely believed that kachchi biryani originated in the Indian subcontinent, specifically in the region of Bengal. The dish is said to have been influenced by the culinary traditions of the Mughals, who ruled over large parts of the Indian subcontinent during the 16th and 17th centuries... ...According to one account, Kachchi Biryani was created during the reign of Nawab Wajid Ali Shah, the last Nawab of Awadh in present-day Uttar Pradesh, India... ...Another legend suggests that Kachchi Biryani was introduced in Bengal during the rule of Murshid Quli Khan, the first Nawab of Bengal, in the 18th century... ...While these historical accounts and legends offer insights into the origin of Kachchi Biryani, it's important to note that the exact details and historical evidence may vary. I think it's pretty clear that that source is saying that the origins of the dish are unclear, and it clearly cannot be used to support a bald assertion that it originated in Dhaka.
The second source, from Roar Media, says this: This food was introduced by the Chaghtai people of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Residents of these winter-dominated regions prefer red meat, especially lamb. They learn to prepare a special meal using rice with red meat and various ingredients, such as butter, pepper, salt, cardamom and local spices such as nutmeg. And that's how kachchi biryani started... ...Later, the fame of this biryani spread in Dhaka city in a very short time through the cooks who came with the Mughal Subedars. So, that also does not support the assertion that it originated in Dhaka.
The third source, 10minuteschool, is a blog written by a student. It is not a reliable source, and should not be used to support any assertion.

Based on all this, please will you remove that content? Thank you. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khania Dighi Mosque has been accepted

Khania Dighi Mosque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Isaidnoway (talk) 06:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 06:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hello, Stewmuhn,

Please stop with the unnecessary page moves. It is disruptive editing and can lead to a loss of editing privileges. There is no good reason why you should need to move an article multiple times, especially not as many times as you moved that article. It makes it look like you don't know what you are doing as an editor and it just creates a lot of unnecessary redirects. Please think through a page move before you do it, don't move pages impulsively and move an article only once.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Moshari. UtherSRG (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please be aware of WP:ETHNICITY in your edits, especially in your addition of Bengali where it would be considered anachronistic. We use "Indian" et al for pre-1947 cats and that is the English Wikipedia standard, do not remove them. You can add cats which are supported by the article but not reject wiki precedents. The same goes for the body of the article as well. Gotitbro (talk) 10:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And please use the account you have created to edit, do not use multiple IPs (WP:Editing while logged out) which may be considered WP:IP socking especially if used to re-inforce your edits in articles. Gotitbro (talk) 11:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:8th-century Bengalis

A tag has been placed on Category:8th-century Bengalis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jalali Set (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need sources that covers the subject significantly, see WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jalali Set and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ana Book Store for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ana Book Store is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Book Store until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Procyon117 (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hormuz Ullah Shayda (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hormuz Ullah Shayda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]