User talk:SufiGulati
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, SufiGulati, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I notice that one of the first articles you created was Sufi Gulati, which appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.
The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! for (;;) (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sufi Gulati
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sufi Gulati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Velella Velella Talk 17:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Reference Link
[edit]http://www.galaxyreporter.com/2016/06/sufi-gulati-debuts-bollywood-movie-luv-ke-funday.html#
Nomination of Sufi Gulati for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sufi Gulati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sufi Gulati until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bahnhof St Gallen (talk) 07:12, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Taimur Ali Khan
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Taimur Ali Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
The article Mausam Ikrar Ke Do Pal Pyaar Ke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable upcoming film with no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying either WP:NFILM or WP:NFF.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 03:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Kaash Tum Hote
[edit]
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The article Kaash Tum Hote has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable film with no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Most of the current sources aren't reliable and reliable sources are interviews with the main lead actress Preeti Jhangiani. Notable cast members do not generally grant notability. What is missing is critical reviews and press coverage and the creator appears to have a conflict of interest.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
SufiGulati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey I'm not related any of these accounts, I really dont know what made you decide that. Please check again it may some common edits and till now i have not violated any wikipedia rules on serious note. Its a please check again. THANK You
Decline reason:
The behavioural and technical similarities are very clear; you will need to explain why you were using the same computer to edit the same articles as the blocked accounts. Yunshui 雲水 11:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
SufiGulati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey sometimes I use cybercafe, to edit this is purely coincidence that I edited the same article. Can i know which article or what edits are similar?
Decline reason:
Oh come on. It's no coincidence. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
SufiGulati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please check again how many articles i have edited from same computer, please dont be rude i swear really dont what happened please check my editing history. SufiGulati (talk) 13:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Scott (talk) 20:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I removed a duplicate unblock request added by SufiGulati at 20:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC), while the previous request was still open. The reason was:
- Hey that is not my account please look into it
-- Scott (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
SufiGulati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23669 was submitted on Dec 28, 2018 08:30:13. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 08:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
SufiGulati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
the block is no longer necessary because i understand why I am blocked. I made some mistake in the past but that was purely unintended. I think it because of Kaash Tum Hote article that was created was created by me. That movie was not very notable but i created. 2nd I understand how Wikipedia works it is necessary to maintain Wikipedia guidelines to prevent damage or disruption. I am active Wikipedia contributor. You can check my contribution history. and I always will be a useful contributor SufiGulati (talk) 15:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have still not addressed the reason for your block. That to me indicates that you do not understand why you were blocked. You have been found by Courcelles to be using using multiple accounts. The standard offer is available to you. Due to you still not addressing the reason for your block, I am withdrawing your talk page access. Any future unblock requests will need to be made through the Unblock Ticket Request System 5 albert square (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.