User talk:Swamiji.email

This is Swamiji.email's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Swamiji.email! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 17:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShivPrakash (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShivPrakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShivPrakash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 01:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swamiji.email! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 01:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiv Prakash (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails NPOL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shiv Prakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shiv Prakash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiv Prakash (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NPOLITICAN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shiv Prakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shiv Prakash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:BJP official website photo.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:BJP official website photo.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 06:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 07:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shiv Prakash moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shiv Prakash, is not suitable as written to remain published. I've moved your draft to Draftspace where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline and ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 07:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiv Prakash (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NPOLITICIAN.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shiv Prakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shiv Prakash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shiv Prakash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiv Prakash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Prakash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 13:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He is a notable politician. I can provide multiple supporting references. Please guide me further.

Swamiji.email (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC) [reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

See box on the right. --Venkat TL (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, He is in the topmost hierarchy of BJP National Organisation. BJP has only two Organisation secretaries, he is one of them and incharge of six Indian states(West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana). he is special mention and section on BJP webiste. Swamiji.email (talk) 15:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply here or reply on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Prakash. Do Not reply on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shiv Prakash. Only the president of the very notable organization is considered as post notable enough for an article. President of every party cannot have an article. Since BJP is a big party, its president can have an article. But vice president and others cannot. Since he is not the president, his article is being considered for deletion. Please read the rules at WP:ANYBIO and WP:NPOL. Venkat TL (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Swamiji.email Since I already made 4 comments on the deletion page. I will not comment there any more due to WP:BLUDGEON. You are free to comment there. To answer to your question. I have good understanding of politics. But standards of Wikipedia are different than standards in Indian Politics. Wikipedia is an international website, and only people who cross certain benchmarks their articles can be created. Benchmarks are explained at WP:BIO. According to rules it says "multiple" in depth coverage articles are needed. So the more the better. But at least Wikipedia:THREE will be needed. Please click the link Three best sources and read it, to understand.

It was nice to have a polite discussion with you. Hope you found my comments informative. I wish you well. Venkat TL (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's really nice to talk sir, learned so much about Wikipedia policies. Information was well and managed. But still not satisfied, but I guess you will also like curious and hungry minds. Honored to have your guidance. I've mentioned a few in-depth Hindi articles of well-reputed sources in the main page. Hope they will go well. Thanks for your genuine response.Swamiji.email (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you might know Wikipedia acts strictly against promotion or WP:PROMO. Only "already" famous people can have article. So these kind of benchmarks helps in separating "already famous people" from "people who want to be famous". Let me assure you that Wikipedians are smart people. Trying to pass promotional news articles (paid articles) as in depth coverage, does not work. Editors will spot it easily. Very easy to spot. I have reviewed your new links added to the article. they are either election related or promo. Venkat TL (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indent

Please read Help:Talk pages#Indentation and correctly WP:INDENT your comments on Talk pages. Venkat TL (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shiv Prakash

Hello, Swamiji.email. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shiv Prakash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shivprakash

Hello, Swamiji.email. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shivprakash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shivprakash

Hello, Swamiji.email. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shivprakash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]