User talk:TTNY
Welcome
[edit]
|
September 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from A.K.O.O Clothing. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OlYellerTalktome 14:45, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A.K.O.O Clothing, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. OlYellerTalktome 19:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to A.K.O.O Clothing. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — SpikeToronto 20:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the verifiable reference/citation for what A.K.O.O. means. It adds to the article, plus it satisfies WP:V. It was because of WP:V and the lack of a citation that your earlier addition to the article was reverted. Thanks again! — SpikeToronto 21:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at A.K.O.O Clothing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OlYellerTalktome 01:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Either you're intentionally or unintentionally not seeing the references provided regarding the lawsuit or you're intentionally trying to remove them from the article with misleading edit summaries which is something that's heavily looked down on here at Wikipedia. Please discontinue your attempts to remove the content about the lawsuit or as the template above states, you will be blocked from editing. OlYellerTalktome 01:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- TTNY, why do we not combine both versions? That way nothing is left out. With this edit, I have done just that. Otherwise, if you still think it should be removed from the article, please begin a discussion on the article’s talk page. Until a consensus is achieved there, you cannot remove the information regarding the lawsuit. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 04:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)