User talk:T Cells/2015/June

Archives

Regard Rakhee Kapoor Tandon's Another Deletion Tag by Arthistorian1977

Hi,

I appreciate your removing the speedy deletion tag in Rakhee Kapoor Tandon's page. I require your help as the page is once again tagged as a deletion request from the same person who did it last time. I even provided the link of the list where she is mentioned among the Top 25 India's Influential Woman. She is clearly notable as I have provided 6 News links and 3 other authentic media houses/publishing reports. I hope you go through the issue and take your own fair decision. Regards, Tanishq (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I declined their request. If they tag it inappropriately again, feel free to let me know. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 10:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£}, but the article is again added for nomination, this time creating a discussion page on AfD. Do let me know the steps to take, I have already voted a Strong Keep in here: Articles for Deletion/Rakhee Kapoor Tandon.

Regards, Tanishq (talk) 14:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tanishqsh: I closed the discussion per consensus at WP:AfD. She is clearly notable. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regards Speedy deletion of Asadulla Pasha

Hi, Thanks for reviewing the page earlier. After the page Asadulla Pasha being tagged for speedy deletion a week ago, it had been improved by different users, and raised concerned were hopefully addressed, including substantial justification/verifiablity that it's not "unambiguously promotional". Could you please check it once and remove the tag now. Thanks User:Fasiullah 05:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allow the WP:AfD to run its course. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regards Kaymu AfD Nomination

Hi, Wikicology. Thanks for helping with finding reliable sources for the Kaymu AfD page. In the meanwhile, need I do anything? Or I just wait and allow the 'AfD run its course'? Thanks. Captainzarmani (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome Captainzarmani. Feel free to vote "keep" in the debate if you want the article to be kept and try to use those sources I provided in the article. Thanks for improving Wikipedia. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Fredrick Obateru Akinruntan

Hello! Your submission of Fredrick Obateru Akinruntan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dravecky (talk) 05:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:African woman.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:African woman.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Innocent Umezulike page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Femi Robinson

On 18 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Femi Robinson, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Femi Robinson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Onowu Anyasodike article is in accordance to wiki policies

Onowu Anyasodike is a notable person that has played big part in Rivers State politics and is also doing so. he is a person leading millions of Non- Indigenes in RIvers state. I believe if you observe closely you will notice that the citations provided is as such in accordance to my claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insonet (talk • contribs) 07:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seing the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources that established the subject notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 07:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the few i have given shows he is notable in Rivers State and as such it makes him notable, you should know that in Nigeria things like internet sources is not really our thing not until lately. someone who controls millions of people in Rives State places him as a notable person.Onwughalu Uchechukwu 18:08, 22 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insonet (talk • contribs)

You are probably not familiar with WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Please always remember to sign your post. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:32, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reynaldo Aguirre

Can you explain why you removed the speedy deletion template from this article, explaining in your edit summary that "it does not apply"? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:37, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy deletion nomination because the subject of the article already had an article here and that gave me the impression that the subject is likely to be notable per non-english sources available but since am unfamiliar with sources in the subject's own language, I had no choice than to allow someone else to review it perhaps take to WP:AfD. In the same vain, I left a note on the article's talk page immediately I declined the nomination, perhaps you never bother to check that too. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your claim on the talk page says that you deleted the speedy deletion template "because A7 does not applies to articles with a claim of significance". Technically, the guidelines says the article should contain a credible claim of significance, but that aside, what claim of significance did you find in the article? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is your own interpretation of claim of significance? Articles don't have to read for example " this man is notable because"... "This musician is notable because he won 1000+ award. All that aside, why all this questions?? Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Estam University

Merged and moved to correct title. DGG ( talk ) 22:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's fine. Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much...

...for your support over at my RfA, and for your kind words. I shall do my utmost to be worthy of them both. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fredrick Obateru Akinruntan

On 29 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fredrick Obateru Akinruntan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Fredrick Obateru Akinruntan, Africa's second richest king, saw a car for the first time in 1961? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fredrick Obateru Akinruntan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

This is your thank you from the DYK project (pass it on?) Victuallers (talk) 13:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Focus Technologies - PFT

You had requested this page for speedy deletion. 29 June 2015‎ Wikicology (talk | contribs)‎ . . (12,827 bytes) (+12)‎ . . (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G11). (TW)) (undo | thank)

Kindly help me with the reason behind this, as the article is based on a company which has its own standing. The company is a major player in the cloud based content services. The article does not use any promotional tone nor does promote / advertise it's services. It is a plain article that talks about its existence as well as the relevant details about its existence. The sources used are also from reliable national and international publications. Request you to look into this once again and help me understand the problem behind the current article. Thanking you in advance. PriyaThacker (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)Please demonstrate notability as described at WP:NCORP: "significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject". That you personally feel it is a "major player in the cloud based content services" is not relevant to Wikipedia. Also, did you create this at its current location to circumvent page protection on Prime Focus Technologies? — Brianhe (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brianhe said it all. @PriyaThacker: kindly wait untill your Focus Technologies - PFT becomes notable and someone with no WP:COI who knows how to write an encyclopedic article will write about it here. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

You wrote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John C. Wells Planetarium: WP:WWIN say it all and I don't have to write a million words to buttress a point. You probably should not mention me unnecessary at WP:AfD in the future. No, a million words is not necessary, but sufficient words to indicate why you believe the article does not meet the criteria. Don't make other editors have to do the work of figuring out why you nominated the article. And I mentioned you because I needed to convey a message to you. That was not unnecessary. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:15, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]